fbpx 2021 Vår | Page 3 | The Oslo School of Architecture and Design

Languages

2021 Vår

60 160 Urbanism

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK6 By og Arkitektur
Credits: 
18
Course code: 
60 160
Level of study: 
Bachelor
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Andreas Kalstveit
Halvor Weider Ellefsen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Bestått alle emner i GK1 og GK2.

Bestått studiodelen av GK3 og GK4.

Gjennomført (dvs. fått  godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering) i øvrige emner GK3, GK4 og hele GK5.

Course content

6. semester utgjør overgangen til masterstudiet, som i større grad enn grunnundervisningen preges av individuelle valg og faglig spesialisering. Dette skal reflekteres både i oppgavestilling og undervisningsform på GK6. Studioet inneholder aspekter fra de øvrige semestrene i grunnundervisningen, og er ment å samle og videreutvikle allerede tilegnet fagkunnskap. I tillegg skal studioet styrke studentenes teoretiske kompetanse og evne til fagdiskusjon som del av et individuelt prosjektforløp. Studioet reflekterer kompleksiteten i arkitektfaget sett som praksisform, hvor en gitt oppgave kan være preget av ulike faglige innfallsvinkler og ha mange mulige formsvar. Oppgaven som stilles vektlegger undersøkelse og avveining av til dels motsetningsfylte faktorer i en kompleks bykontekst, hvor møtet mellom program, struktur og morfologi skal formuleres i et større arkitekturprosjekt. 

Learning outcome

Etter endt kurs har studentene opparbeidet kunnskap om, og vise ferdigheter i: 1. Å arbeide selvstendig med et arkitekturprosjekt i urban kontekst, basert på enn gitt tomt og delvis gitt program. 2. Å utvikle en reflektert og kritisk holdning til plankrav, program og arkitektonisk/urban kontekst. 3. Å utvikle romlige konsepter og kunne ta avgjørelser basert på komplekse og ofte motsetningsfylte urbane og arkitektoniske behov. 

Working and learning activities

Studiet vil være basert på prosjekteringsprosesser knyttet til en gitt problemstilling og kontekst. Studentene vil arbeide med å utvikle en egen innfallsvinkel til oppgaven gjennom analyse og tematiske studier. Basert på dette, vil studentene individuelt utarbeide et arkitekturprosjekt. Det vil gjennomføres delgjennomganger, individuell prosjektveiledning og workshops i tillegg til avsluttende gjennomgang. 

Det må påberegnes at noe undervisning og veiledning legges digitalt i tråd med gjeldende Covid-restriksjoner. Digitalt oppmøte er forventet på lik linje med fysisk tilstedeværelse.

Curriculum

Pensum vil finnes på kursets hylle i biblioteket ved kursoppstart. Tekster vil også ligge på moodle.

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Exercise Not required
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Exercise
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Not required
Comment:
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Attendance
Excursion
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:
Workload activity:Excursion
Comment:

70 405 Public Sector as Material for Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Design i Offentlig Sektor
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 405
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Ted Matthews
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level (BA-level) courses at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS.

The course is open only for design students. Due to the specific context of the course working knowledge of Norwegian is required.

Course content

This course will investigate the complex structures, systems, experiences, connections and culture of the public service sector in Norway. The primary framing of the course is to consider the public sector as material for design and how investigating this material through visualization and mapping can give access and an understanding of this complex context.

The course will be led by Heidi Dolven & Simon Sandoval from design agency Halogen who are both senior designers with long experience working within the bureaucratic structures of public sector Norway, having worked with policy and ‘forvaltning’ design as well as front end, user-centered public service innovation. The course will also include other leading voices from design, public service management as well as others engaged in questions of public service innovation from several levels of government.

The course is positioned from an interdisciplinary perspective that represents systems orientated design and service design.

The main activity of the course will be to investigate, unpack, reflect, visualize and disseminate the material that is public service sector Norway and make this accessible to other designers and bureaucrats working in this context. The output and value of the activity is not only in the finalized visualizations but in the co-created and co-learning space created between students and the many actors with which they will engage.

Learning outcome

Students will gain an understanding of how the public sector in Norway is constructed; from governmental, to directorate to municipal level. You will also learn about how the Norwegian public services are organized, interconnected, managed and delivered. From a material perspective they will gain an understanding of tensions, flexibilities and qualities within the structure, system and relationships up and through the entire system. You will also learn techniques of dissemination and visualization that will make this material accessible to others whilst honing skills of facilitation and collaboration with others from outside of design.

Specifically you will gain:

  • An overview of how designers can work together with the public sector in Norway
  • An in-depth understanding of the system
  • A sense of the materiality of the system
  • Guidance on how we might unpack and communicate the public sector in Norway
  • Skills of critical reflection
  • Insight on how the use of visualization and mapping might be used as a strategic tool for engagement and reflection

 

 

Working and learning activities

The first few weeks of the course will start with direction from course leaders to help gain an overview of public sector Norway as a whole whilst, through practice, learning visualization skills necessary to engage and disseminate this knowledge.

After the introduction phase students will plan and run workshop activity together with leading experts engaged in public sector management and innovation, representing several disciplinary perspectives to draw out detailed material knowledge about service system.

Finally, students will further investigate, detail and refine their insights into visualizations for dissemination, exhibition and as a vehicle for further discussion.

 

 

 

Curriculum

We will upload links and documents to Moodle. Here are some things to get you going.

  1. Radical Help – Hillary Cottam
  1.  New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century – J. Bourgon
  1. https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk/2020/03/06/introducing-a-government-as-a-system-toolkit/
  1. http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
  1. Lewis, J. M., McGann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. Policy & Politics48(1), 111-130.
  1. Junginger, S. (2013). Design and innovation in the public sector: Matters of design in policy-making and policy implementation. Annual Review of Policy Design1(1), 1-11.
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failYou will deliver the following as part of the course and will be evaluated based upon this: -Individual visualizations of aspects of the area of study -Reflections on the material aspects of public sector Norway -A broader visual narrative that brings together insights from all students that disseminates findings You will be evaluated on the deliverables listed above and your contribution to discussions throughout the course. You should show your understanding of design and public service in your work. Your final piece of work shall be communicated so it highlights the unique characteristics, challenges and potentials of the public sector as material for design.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:You will deliver the following as part of the course and will be evaluated based upon this: -Individual visualizations of aspects of the area of study -Reflections on the material aspects of public sector Norway -A broader visual narrative that brings together insights from all students that disseminates findings You will be evaluated on the deliverables listed above and your contribution to discussions throughout the course. You should show your understanding of design and public service in your work. Your final piece of work shall be communicated so it highlights the unique characteristics, challenges and potentials of the public sector as material for design.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThe students are expected to take active part and be present in the studio, attend lectures and groupwork throughout the whole course. They are expected to attend all presentations, workshops and formal counsellings. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:The students are expected to take active part and be present in the studio, attend lectures and groupwork throughout the whole course. They are expected to attend all presentations, workshops and formal counsellings. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

70 403 Rethinking Development and Sustainable Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Rethinking Development and Sustainable Design
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 403
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
12
Person in charge
Håkan Edeholt
Birger Sevaldson
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level courses (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS. Open to all study programs.

Course content

The elective course "Rethinking Development and Sustainable Design" is a reading course that takes a critical stance by scrutinizing both "Development" and "Sustainability", as public discourses typically seem to understand these two interrelated concepts today. The goal is to reveal and discuss what kind of developmental paradigm these discourses typically try to sustain and if there are other alternatives to be found that also could be promoted and acted on. System Oriented Design (SOD) approaches will also, whenever appropriate, be used to both analyze and underpin the discussions held. The final deliverable will typically be some sort of a reader containing reviews of literature read and discussions held.

Learning outcome

On completing the class, the students will have:

KNOWLEDGE

  • improved their knowledge about "Development" and "Sustainable Design".
  • knowledge about and experience in critical readings of texts.

SKILLS

  • developed their skills to write their own texts.
  • developed their skills to describe and discuss their own and others´ texts in an academic seminar setting.

 

GENERAL COMPETENCE

  • developed a critical and reflective stance towards society, trends, development and design.

 

Working and learning activities

The content of the class spans from practical work with texts to lectures, discussions, student presentations and the final Reader. Students are expected to deliver two reviews each of two books or other relevant sources; one being from the reading list and one that has been found through own research.

Curriculum

The pensum is developed as part of the course's own seminar process

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)-Pass / failSelf-assessment and assessment by; peer students, internal sensor and teachers in the course. Each student’s contribution to the course and how this relates to the expected “Learning outcome”. Together with active attendance this will be the main issues to be assessed. The final deliverable is e.g. a reader containing reviews of literature read and discussions held.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:-
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Self-assessment and assessment by; peer students, internal sensor and teachers in the course. Each student’s contribution to the course and how this relates to the expected “Learning outcome”. Together with active attendance this will be the main issues to be assessed. The final deliverable is e.g. a reader containing reviews of literature read and discussions held.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceActive attendance and involvement in producing the final Reader is expected. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:Active attendance and involvement in producing the final Reader is expected. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

Start semester

70 406 Design leadership

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Design leadership
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 406
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Monika Hestad
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level courses (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS.

Course content

In this course we are unpacking what design leadership is and why it is important for organisations. Design, and in particularly design thinking, have gained attention on strategic management levels. Some of the promises are that a designerly approach in the innovation process can help companies in digital transformation, and to develop proposals that meet consumers’ needs, dreams and wants; to name a few applications.

Design becoming part of the management discourse raises several questions. What characterises design leadership? How does design thinking differ from traditional management thinking? How can a designerly way of thinking and working contribute to the top management of an organisation?  What are the present hinderances where designers come up short in a management role?

The course is explorative in its nature. We have so far only scratched the surface of what design might contribute with in a management context. Therefore, the aim of the course is twofold: first to unpack current knowledge within the field of design leadership, but also to contribute to the further development of it.

Learning outcome

Knowledge

Understanding the current state of design leadership and role of designers in management positions

Basic understanding of traditional management thinking and how a design approach may differ

 

Skills

Improved qualitative research skills

Improved design research skills

Improved collaborative skills

 

General competence

Developed an understanding of opportunities and challenges of design leadership  

Apply the students’ design skills in strategy and business development.

 

Working and learning activities

The course is a combination of lectures, discussion groups, workshops and group work. In the first part, the students will explore a wide range of topics within

management, design leadership, design thinking and strategy. The course is explorative and follows a design research structure that has some key stages:

Part one: Understand and define

Mapping design leadership in literature and in the industry. Developing research approach and conducting primary research. Share insights with class through mapping exercise.

Part two: In-depth research and conceptualising

Narrowing scope and exploring key concepts in teams. Developing new concepts and methods that could be brought into the management discourse. Conceptualise the insights.

Part three: Testing and sharing

Planning the conference and making sketch-models of ways of sharing insights.

The course will culminate in a design leadership conference where the students present designerly approaches to strategy and business development.

Curriculum

Obligatorisk pensum:

Maeda, John. 2011. Redesigning Leadership. Cambridge, Massachusetts. The MIT Press

 

Other (will be updated)

Hestad, Monika; Grønlig Anders and Rigoni Silvia. 2017. The Little Booklet on Design thinking: An introduction. London. Brand Valley Publications.

 

Lewrick, Michael, Link Patrick and Leifer, Larry. 2018. The Design thinking playbook: Mindful digital transformation of teams, products, services, businesses and ecosystems. New Jersey. Wiley.

 

McKeown, Max. 2011. The Strategy Book: How to Think and Act Strategically to Deliver Outstanding Results, 1st ed, London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.

 

Turner, Raymond. 2016. Design Leadership: Securing the Strategic Value of Design. London & New York. A Gower book/ Routledge.

 

Diverse online:

Horn, Robert. 2018.

If You Don’t Embrace Design as a CEO, You Risk Becoming a Dinosaur. Fortune.

Found at: http://fortune.com/2018/03/07/design-leadership-ceo/

Fast Company, business magazine: https://www.fastcompany.com

Harvard Business Review, business journal: https://hbr.org

Design Management Institute: https://www.dmi.org

 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)-Pass / failThe students are expected to participate in class at lectures and discussion seminar. Active participation in classes and the ability to communicate and reflect on the subject. Participation and final presentation at the design leadership conference.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:-
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The students are expected to participate in class at lectures and discussion seminar. Active participation in classes and the ability to communicate and reflect on the subject. Participation and final presentation at the design leadership conference.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceStudents are expected to participate in class at lectures and discussion seminars and tutoring. Students are expected to take advantage of the time allotted for self-study and to read the given and recommended literature within their chosen or given area of design management. Gruppearbeid Students are expected to actively participate in classes and workshops and contribute to a professional and constructive collaboration
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:Students are expected to participate in class at lectures and discussion seminars and tutoring. Students are expected to take advantage of the time allotted for self-study and to read the given and recommended literature within their chosen or given area of design management. Gruppearbeid Students are expected to actively participate in classes and workshops and contribute to a professional and constructive collaboration

70 700 Pre-diploma Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Pre-Diplom Design
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 700
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Rachel Troye
Required prerequisite knowledge

Completed 240 ECTS in total.

Course content

The PreDip course aims to help students to develop a solid launch pad for their diploma projects, one that will allow them to start their design/research process from a knowledgeable and critical position and with a clear plan.

The choice of theme is primarily in the hands of each student, and the direction in which this subject is to take is mainly the result of consultations between each student and their supervisor, the institute leader, and the course staff.

The course is organized in two main phases. The first phase focus both on the individual student’s own skills and interests and the choice of the actual theme of the project. This first phase will be presented and assessed at a midterm-presentation (after app. 1 month). The second phase deals with designing the actual project with a feasible project proposal as its main and final delivery.

 

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

- A reflective, constructive and critical stance to his or her own disciplinary interests, strengths and weaknesses.

SKILLS
- An ability to pitch concepts for as well peers as for potential tutors and partners.

- An ability to develop a feasible diploma project as required at the Institute of Design at AHO.

- An ability to plan an independent or colloborative project.

GENERAL COMPETANCE
- An ability to convey his or her maturity as a designer at a level that make a positive outcome for a diploma project at AHO very likely.

- An ability to conceptualize design ideas into an actionable project proposal

- An ability to propose, discuss and plan an independent study and design project.

Working and learning activities

The course will mix lectures, own research and writing with presentations and tutoring.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
ReportIndividualPass / fail The student is responsible for taking required initiatives to make agreement with both main and secondary tutor. Furthermore, the student should submit the required deliverables and present the given assignments in plenary presentations according to the timetable of the course. The final submission consists of a final written project description and a final plenary presentation, which both are compulsory. Passed course requires approved written project description and oral presentation.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Report
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment: The student is responsible for taking required initiatives to make agreement with both main and secondary tutor. Furthermore, the student should submit the required deliverables and present the given assignments in plenary presentations according to the timetable of the course. The final submission consists of a final written project description and a final plenary presentation, which both are compulsory. Passed course requires approved written project description and oral presentation.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceIt must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

12 802 Diploma Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Diplom design
Credits: 
30
Course code: 
12 802
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Rachel Troye
Required prerequisite knowledge

Completed pre-diploma and 270 ECTS in total.

Course content

The diploma at the Institute of Design is the final project in the Master programme. The Institute takes a broad approach to the design profession that includes products, services, systems and interactive experiences. The education brings together aesthetics and technology, creativity and design methods, culture and research. The programme has roots in Industrial Design, but today also includes Interaction Design, Service Design and Systems Oriented Design. This is reflected in the width of our students’ diplomas, and the broad range of themes that they address.

The diploma concludes our five-year Master in design and is done in the final semester. The diploma is a self-initiated and self-organised project that takes place over 18 weeks. The students develop and define their own project-descriptions (the diploma programme) in a pre-diploma’ course, in the semester leading up to the diploma. During the diploma project the students have a main supervisor at the Institute, but can also seek additional input and guidance form across AHO and externally. Diplomas are typically done as individual projects, but can also be done in groups.

The diplomas at the Institute of Design are characterised by variety and breadth. The diploma projects are typically initiated and developed by the students, and they are free to explore different themes and formats. These can be creative explorations, product development and theoretical projects, or collaborations with commercial companies, public services or researchprojects. Diplomas can also be discursive design projects that seek to raise questions or challenge societal or cultural issues. Often our diplomas are ‘hybrids’ that bring together different methods and actors, or span across our different design specialisations.

The purpose of the diploma is multi-layered. The students have to bring together what they have learned throughout their education to define and develop their own project. A challenge here is how the project is followed through, how it is developed and how it is executed as a design project. In the scope of the Master, the diploma is a relatively large project that demands that the student is self-driven, organised, structured and creative. At the same time, the diploma is a possibility for the student to explore his or her own identity as a designer, to research topics she or he finds interesting, or to challenge the students acquired skills and methods. The diplomas should therefore be understood holistically as projects where the students get to choose their own themes, approaches and processes, but where the challenge is also about organising and developing the project itself. Defining and developing the scope and plan for the project is done both in the project-description (diploma programme), as well as throughout the process.

It is important to note that in doing a holistic evaluation of the diplomas, the focus should be on the project itself rather than how closely it follows the initial description or diplomaprogramme.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

By completing a diploma the students base of knowledge will be about:

-design methods, materials, technologies and tools

-design history in related field

-research methods, design processes

-use of users and targets groups in projects

SKILLS

-be able to develop design solutions through artistic and scientific research, concept visualization, co-working and finalizing a project.

-master design-driven methods, tools and ways of expression, and be able to use this in a creative process, in a goal-oriented, professional and experimenting way.

-be able to reflect on the relationship between content and the project and the wider world.

-be able to communicate both process and end result in a good way.

GENERAL COMPETENCE

-be able to communicate values and concepts and inspire dialog and interdisciplinary processes through a wide range of design methods and tools.

-be able to perform a set of professional roles and cooperate well with other occupational groups.

-be able to reflect on own performance and deliveries and stretch beyond own limits.

-take responsibility for own learning and academic progression, be able to transfer knowledge into other fields.

- be considerate on own contribution and ethical questions at hand.

 

Evaluation

The students deliver their diplomas in the form of their collected outputs, a presentation and a report. The outputs can be a variety of formats; models, prototypes, installations, diagrams, visualisations, mappings etc. The diploma report should give an overview of the project, the process, the possible outcomes (impacts) and the student’s reflections. The report should not be evaluated on its own, but as giving an overview of the project. The students also deliver a 20-minute public presentation of their diploma on the day of the evaluation. The sensors shall evaluate the compete diploma project delivery consisting of the students collected outputs, their report and public presentation.

Evaluation process
The evaluation of the diplomas are done by an external team of sensors. This sensor-team represents the different design-directions that the students can specialise towards. All the sensors are responsible for the overall evaluation of all diplomas, but each sensor is given particular responsibility for a selection of diplomas. The sensor team is first given the diploma reports digitally. These report should give an overview of the diplomas. The reports should be read by the sensors in preparation for the evaluation at AHO. The physical outcomes of the projects is presented to the sensors at AHO. On the day of the diploma-presentations each student is given 20 minutes to present their diploma. The sensor-team then have a total of 15 minutes for questions, discussion and feedback. These 15 minutes should also include a brief summary of the sensors evaluation and overall feedback. This is a public event for the whole of the school and the intentions for this presentation-format is to facilitate dynamic discussions about the diplomas and interesting responses, as well as a learning situation for other students The sensor-team’s final evaluation is given as a written report for each project. This is delivered some time after the public presentation day.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
ReportIndividualPass / failIn evaluating a diploma, the aim is to consider how the diploma has been developed as a project; including both its thematics, its processes, its outcomes and its reflections. The diplomas should be evaluated on the terms, problematics and scope that the students themselves have defined in their project. The overall diploma project is given the grades ‘pass’ or ‘fail’.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Report
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:In evaluating a diploma, the aim is to consider how the diploma has been developed as a project; including both its thematics, its processes, its outcomes and its reflections. The diplomas should be evaluated on the terms, problematics and scope that the students themselves have defined in their project. The overall diploma project is given the grades ‘pass’ or ‘fail’.

70 600 Industrial Design 2: Transform

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Industridesign 2: Transform
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 600
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2022
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Nina Bjørnstad
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level courses at AHO (BA level) or equivalent education of 180 ECTS. Experience with 3D modeling.

Students with Industrial Design I will have priority.

2 year international master students must have been approved for industrial design.

Course content

Transform is an advanced course in industrial design dealing with new tools for developing, prototyping and conveying design solutions. Primacy is given to new contexts and themes that rather require radical than incremental solutions. The course is organized around two extensive main iterations and phases. The first phase is based on a foresight a few decades ahead and then, as a second phase, the result of the first phase is back-casted in time and transformed by design to a more contemporary context. The outcome of both phases will be physical products conveyed by both digital media and physical models.

The course focuses specifically on the active use of various forms of physical and digital prototypes that supports the innovation process. Traditional sketching and model building will therefore be blended with explorations, 3D modelling, video-sketching, VR and other forms of conveying a rich variety of different design concepts. Independent of which technology is used, emphasis will always be on the core competences traditionally found in industrial design.

Learning outcome

The student shall after the course be able to participate in more advanced and complex design processes; and doing so as an independent designer with a creative, aesthetic and designerly approach.

KNOWLEDGE

By the completion of the course the student shall have knowledge about:

  • the kind of solution driven design process being so inherent in the industrial design tradition.
  • video- and VR-based sketching methods.
  • the kind of research methods developed within the industrial design tradition.
  • various themes like Radical Change, Sustainability, Future studies and Foresight.

SKILLS
By the completion of the course the student shall have the ability to:

  • use an industrial designer’s toolbox including (but not limited to); sketching through different media, creative methods, team work, foresight and presentation.
  • learn new things quickly, typically in entirely new context and often without any relevant users able to be informants or co-designers.

COMPETENCE
By the completion of the course the student shall:

  • have an updated State of the Arts (SoA) competence in industrial design. 
  • have a reflective and realistic understanding of his/her present competence and what's required to achieve sufficient professional knowledge and skills within another year of practice at IDE/AHO. For each individual student, the curricula might therefore be slightly modified.
Working and learning activities

The work is arranged as a design studio with lectures, workshops and presentations woven in as a natural part of the activity. Both phases involve workshop time.

The students inspire and evaluate each other along the way through interviews, co-writing, co-design and student-driven assessment.

Curriculum

Selected chapters from:

Rabiger M. 2008 (1996). Directing. Film techniques and aesthetics.  2nd ed. Focal Press, Burlington, MA, USA.

 

Dunne. A & Raby F. 2013. MIT. Speculative everything. Design, fiction, and social dreaming.  

 https://skepticalscience.com 

https://biomimicry.net/the-buzz/resources/biomimicry-designlens/

http://learnstorytelling.tumblr.com

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failThe course will primarily be assessed through project work, self-assessments and deliveries submitted as design models, videos and presentations. The first phase is assessed by involved teachers and finally the whole course is assessed by an external supervisor. The student need pass both phases to pass the course. For students that fail one of the two modules, a portfolio assessment of the whole coursework will be carried out in the end of the semester to finally decide if the student has reached the desired learning outcome
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The course will primarily be assessed through project work, self-assessments and deliveries submitted as design models, videos and presentations. The first phase is assessed by involved teachers and finally the whole course is assessed by an external supervisor. The student need pass both phases to pass the course. For students that fail one of the two modules, a portfolio assessment of the whole coursework will be carried out in the end of the semester to finally decide if the student has reached the desired learning outcome
Workload activityComment
Attendance The students are expected to take active part and be present in the studio, attend lectures and groupwork throughout the whole course. They are expected to attend all presentations, workshops and formal counsellings. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment: The students are expected to take active part and be present in the studio, attend lectures and groupwork throughout the whole course. They are expected to attend all presentations, workshops and formal counsellings. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

70 601 Interaction Design 2: Screens

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Interaction Design 2: Screens
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 601
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Mosse Sjaastad
Lars Marcus Vedeler
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level courses at AHO (BA-level) or equivalent education of 180 ECTS.

Students that have taken Interaction Design 1 will have first priority, and students with Service Design 1 have second priority.

2 year international master students must have been approved for interaction design

Course content

The second part of the interaction design programme focuses on the complex connected world we now live in, where visual interfaces are increasingly prevalent (from mobile phones to large public information systems and presenting designers with fascinating, complex and highly relevant challenges. The course explores how these interfaces can be effectively integrated into networks and spaces; the information they contain and the messages they impart; and how we, as users, engage and interact with them.

New digital technologies, and the internet in particular, have changed the ways of production and consumption of information. The internet itself has undergone a sea-change in recent years, from primarily static and closed systems to infrastructures where openness, information sharing, collaboration and creativity are key ingredients. 

Massive information datasets and structures need to be presented in dynamic, user-friendly and accessible ways, allowing for easy navigation, providing an overview as well as detailed analysis. These sophisticated design challenges will be explored in a range of workshops and projects.The course will provide students with appropriate practical skills, design methods and design thinking tools, enabling them to tackle advanced screen-based design issues, and leading to the creation of engaging, informative and effective interfaces. The semester is a compilation of several smaller modules and workshops to introduce the students to the new and more screen specific methods, processes and tools that will form the core of the term. This will be followed by one final project, where students will develop more in-depth conceptual frameworks.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

Students will

• gain an insight and understanding of the fundamental challenges in the design of screen-based interaction design, and apply this to the design of engaging user-experiences

• understand the roles and opportunities for the designer in a technologically driven environment.

SKILLS

Students will

• improve their screen-based graphical technical and production skills

• be able to use tools and methods to prototype interactive concepts

• get aqainted with the iterative design process through hands-on tasks

• develop their skills at communicating their concepts and ideas in an engaging and convincing manner

Working and learning activities

Many small modules 

The semester is divided into many shorter modules, that together will form a comprehensive introduction to the field. Most of these modules will be initiated by lectures and/or workshops, followed by students working on their assignments with mentoring from the staff. Due to the intensity of the whole semester, we pride ourselves on the available supporting staff in many of the modules. 

Frequent crit’s and presentations 

In addition to mentoring, ‘the crit’ is the core method for dialogue throughout the semester, and students will engage in progress discussions and presentation 1 to 2 times weekly throughout the whole semester. 

Partner collaboration 

In the final module the students can choose from a various tasks with external collaborators. These collaborators range from local business and design consultant companies, to design research projects and future envisioning conceptualization. 

Group work 

Students will be working individually or in groups of two. 

Curriculum

Designing for Interaction: Creating Smart Applications and Clever Devices. Dan Saffer. New Riders

Microinteractions: Designing with details. Dan Saffer. O’Reilly Media

Intertwingled: Information Changes Everything. Peter Morville. Semantic Studios

Inventing the medium: principles of interaction design asa cultural practice. Janet H Murray. The MIT Press

Designing interactions. Bill Moggridge. The MIT Press

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failThe course consist of 4 - 7 modules, and all modules need to be passed in order to pass the whole course. Evaluation will be based on the following elements in percentage: • 95% Design projects, presentations, minor deliverables, workshops and appropriate presentation material for the final project. Projects will be assessed for their creativity, expression, innovation, usability and appropriateness of design. • 5% contribution towards the group exhibition The course will be assessed by an external sensor/examiner. The course is evaluated as pass or fail. If during the semester the student fail in one of the modules, they will be given the option to supply material within the timeframe of the semester. And in addition, the external sensor for the final module will go through all the deliverables from the whole semester for this student do a portfolio evaluation.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The course consist of 4 - 7 modules, and all modules need to be passed in order to pass the whole course. Evaluation will be based on the following elements in percentage: • 95% Design projects, presentations, minor deliverables, workshops and appropriate presentation material for the final project. Projects will be assessed for their creativity, expression, innovation, usability and appropriateness of design. • 5% contribution towards the group exhibition The course will be assessed by an external sensor/examiner. The course is evaluated as pass or fail. If during the semester the student fail in one of the modules, they will be given the option to supply material within the timeframe of the semester. And in addition, the external sensor for the final module will go through all the deliverables from the whole semester for this student do a portfolio evaluation.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThis is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Students are expected to participate and be present on a daily basis with continuous work effort throughout the semester. There is a 90 % mandatory attendance expected for lectures and workshops. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:This is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Students are expected to participate and be present on a daily basis with continuous work effort throughout the semester. There is a 90 % mandatory attendance expected for lectures and workshops. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

70 602 Service Design 2: Service Design Futures

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Tjenestedesign 2: Fremtidens tjenestedesign
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 602
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Josina Vink
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent education with 180 ECTS.

Students who have taken Service Design 1 will be preferred, but this is not a requirement for this course.

International 2 year master students must have been approved for service design.

Recommended previous knowledge.

  • Service Design concepts and methodologies
  • User centred design methodologies
  • Qualitative data analysis
  • Ideation techniques
  • Prototyping
  • Concept communication
Course content

The course focuses on honing existing Service Design knowledge and competencies through practice by direct access to the schools focus areas of research, whilst actively contributing to their development.

In addition undertaking this form of learning through contributing to research, the students will develop their ability to reflect on their own design practice within the rigorous framework of research practice.

These research focus areas are:

  1. Innovation in healthcare. This is carried out through C3. 
  2. Designing with Rituals. Measuring creativity through innovations in service design approach.
  3. Innovation in methods and tools: Developing tangible tools for Trendslation.
  4. Designing in bureaucracy. Raising empathy for service providers through design.

By working with these areas students will practice what they have learnt in Service Design I and/or GK5 and GK6 by applying these design skills through ‘research-by-design’ to ongoing research projects with in-house researchers together with their external partners.

 

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

  • Understand and appropriate research methodologies used within design research projects.
  • Develop an analytical approach to the field of Service Design
  • Reflection on what design research and its methodologies mean for service design practice and vice versa

SKILLS

  • Ability to read, understand and contribute to design research
  • Ability to analyse a service design problem in relation to relevant research theories and models
  • Ability to translate theoretical models into practical tools
  • The ability to reflect upon the nature of service design in relation to other disciplines
  • The ability to describe your position within the field of service design

GENERAL COMPETENCE 

  • Gain an overview of the state of the art of Service Design research
  • Promote an active and designerly participation within research projects

 

 

 

 

Working and learning activities

The course is run differently from Service Design 1. In Service Design 2 students will be working more independently and in close collaboration with the researchers that are part of C3 and ritual service design.

The main learning activities will be based upon research projects in collaboration with external partners, where the students will be part of the research team. The course also integrates studio work (group and individual), tutoring and reflective sessions in the classroom, workshops, structured presentations, and discussions with the course participants.

There will also be lectures with invited guests, designers and researchers. The students are expected to read some curriculum litterature.

Evaluation

 

 

 

Curriculum

Blomkvist, J., Clatworthy, S., & Holmlid, S. (2016). Ways of seeing the design material of service. In Service Design Geographies. The ServDes. 2016 Conference, Copenhagen 24-26 May 2016 (Vol. 125, pp. 1-13). Linköping University Electronic Press.

Crouch, C., & Pearce, J. (2012). Doing research in design. Oxford: Berg.

Clatworthy, S., Oorschot, R., & Lindquister, B. (2014, June). How to get a leader to talk: Tangible objects for strategic conversations in service design. In ServDes. 2014 Service Future; Proceedings of the fourth Service Design and Service Innovation Conference; Lancaster University; United Kingdom; 9-11 April 2014 (No. 099, pp. 270-280). Linköping University Electronic Press.

Matthews, Ted. " The Experiential Mesh: A New Service Development model for designing highly experiential services." International Conference on Service Science and Innovation 2014. Taipei (2013).

Matthews, Ted. "Sacred Services: The Potential for Service Design of Theory Relating to the Sacred." Artifact 3.2 (2014): 6-1.

Matthews, Ted, “Introducing Graphic Experiential Evidencing (GEE). How can the use of graphic novel fill a gap in the service design toolkit for communicating experience and emotion?” Design and Emotion 2016, Amsterdam. (2016)

Matthews, T., Sacred Service: The Use of ‘Sacred Theory’ in Service Design, Journal of Design, Business and Society 3(1), 67–97. (2017).

Pfannstiel, M. A., & Rasche, C. (2019). Service Design and Service Thinking in Healthcare and Hospital Management. Springer International Publishing.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)-Pass / failBeing a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through both projects will be presented by means of: • Group and individual mid-term deliverables • Workshops • Evidencing material In each module students will have group and individual deliverables that will receive qualitative assessment to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The course will involve the participation in one or more modules related C3 and ritual service design projects and the research connected to these.  At the beginning of each module, the structure, contents and examination form will be detailed. Each project will have a final presentation and report that will be assessed in pass/fail by an external sensor and the course leader. The details for each project regarding particular deliverables and the evaluation criteria will be described in the brief for each project at the beginning of the module. The students need to pass both modules to pass the course. For those students that fail one of two modules, a portfolio assessment of the whole coursework (this comprises all group and individual mid-term deliverables presented by the student during the semester, additionally to the final presentation), will be carried out by the course leader, the module responsible and a second Service Design lecturer from the Institute at the end of the semester to finally decide if the student has reached the course learning outcomes.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:-
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Being a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through both projects will be presented by means of: • Group and individual mid-term deliverables • Workshops • Evidencing material In each module students will have group and individual deliverables that will receive qualitative assessment to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The course will involve the participation in one or more modules related C3 and ritual service design projects and the research connected to these.  At the beginning of each module, the structure, contents and examination form will be detailed. Each project will have a final presentation and report that will be assessed in pass/fail by an external sensor and the course leader. The details for each project regarding particular deliverables and the evaluation criteria will be described in the brief for each project at the beginning of the module. The students need to pass both modules to pass the course. For those students that fail one of two modules, a portfolio assessment of the whole coursework (this comprises all group and individual mid-term deliverables presented by the student during the semester, additionally to the final presentation), will be carried out by the course leader, the module responsible and a second Service Design lecturer from the Institute at the end of the semester to finally decide if the student has reached the course learning outcomes.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThis is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Students are required to attend at least 80% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project to pass the course. The course leader will take assistance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session and will inform the students when they are close to failing the course due to attendance. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:This is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Students are required to attend at least 80% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project to pass the course. The course leader will take assistance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session and will inform the students when they are close to failing the course due to attendance. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

70 507 Service of Living

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Service of Living
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 507
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
15
Person in charge
Ted Matthews
Required prerequisite knowledge

This is an advanced, cross-disciplinary master course directed to both students of Architecture and Service Design. A goal of the studio is to create a collaborative and cross-disciplinary environment, where students with a diverse set of skill and knowledge can exchange and learn new ways of working, using service design thinking, social sciences and architecture methods. However due to the advance and experimental nature of this course, service designers will have expected to have completed 1 full semester of service design education at Masters level. The course is open for all Master students from Architecture.

Course content

IDE + IA in close collaboration with Comte Bureau and OBOS Living lab -  A cross disciplinary exercise to redefine the housing typology in Oslo.

We all have experience of what it means to live in an apartment; a horizontally arranged dwelling with a number of rooms serving different purposes – sleeping, cooking, and so on. 

Buildings are built for people, and by people. The studio wants to explore in greater depth what it means to live in an apartment and how decisions makers, developers, architects and designers can develop buildings more fitted to the needs of users today. How we by combining tools and methods available from social sciences, service design and architecture, can go deeper into routines and use of today’s households. 

In the 1930s Oslo municipality gathered a research group consisting of architects, engineers and sociologists to work together to improve the housing offered in Oslo. The (urban) housing typologies we see in Oslo today, are partially the result of their work.  

In 2020 the challenges are different. Family structures, consumption patterns, technology, the way we work, the way we eat — in general the way we live our lives, and how we share them — have changed. At the same time, it’s been a rising awareness of sustainable living, especially in urban areas. Why haven’t the housing typologies changed to answer this? 

In this course students will investigate how people “do” living today (this will be in the specific context of urban Oslo), and design the living of tomorrow. The course will investigate questions such as: How can housing be design based on people's needs? How can housing be designed to enable more sustainable living? How can we design housing as a service of living?

Based on this, the course will be delivered in partnership with OBOS and their unit OBOS Living lab (OLL), an experimental living arena that tests hypotheses on solutions that can enable quality in affordable living. It will have a focus on broader themes defined by OLL in close collaboration with AHO and the two institutes involved. In this context we will try to understand, design and test solutions based on human behavior These broad themes are: sustainability, flexibility, sense of community, sharing/privacy, integration. These might be approached on a broader level or be focused on specific questions, for example: how do we design for shared facilities/spaces or focused on challenges and opportunities such as how do we design for better on ground floor living experiences.

The challenges posed by contemporary global culture are far too complex, wide-ranging and interconnected to be solved by one design field alone. Instead they require cross-disciplinary problem solvers from allied disciplines to collaborate to craft a new way of thinking and working. In this course we therefore wish to enable architecture and design students to work as a team. Therefore, the course will also be run together with Comte Bureau who is a leading actor in developing projects merging design and architectural competences. 

Students will explore a cross-disciplinary, user-based working process and methodology. Involving, defining needs of target groups and translating needs into solutions, and finally methodology for testing them. All aspects that influence the way we live, such as service systems, culture, energy, food, social, technology, economy etc. will be taken in consideration.

Students will be expected to deliver an account of their process relating to insight and research phase as well as solutions that address target group needs. This could be in the form of models, service offerings or large-scale prototypes. However, this is not prescriptive and solutions will be judged on how well they address target group needs whilst reflecting the competencies of the cross-disciplinary teams involved.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE 

·     To develop an understanding of the potential of a reconceptualization of the built space as a service of ‘living’ that delivers ‘value in use’ to its target audience. 

·     A new understanding of the potential for cross disciplinary collaboration between service, interaction design and architecture. 

·     Develop a user centered approach to architecture practice. 

SKILLS 

·     Develop and refine the skills of observation, analysis, and creativity that lead to the formulation of relevant and valuable solutions for the user(s) within the context of architectural practice. 

·     Develop new ways of working within an emerging cross disciplinary space to utilize service design thinking, social science and architecture practice. 

·     Develop skills of visualization to communicate user needs and lived experience as well as a projected experience. 

·     Develop skills in planning and delivering appropriate prototypes and solutions for dissemination of findings. 

·     Develop collaborative skills to work with designers, architects, users, and different stakeholders that enable a proactive and professional role in cross disciplinary teams of the future. 

GENERAL COMPETENCE 

·     Understand the role and value of each discipline (service design and architecture) involved in a future of cross disciplinary development of the built space. 

·     Gain methodical insight by actively participating in a cross disciplinary process. 

·     Promote professional experience in cross disciplinary teams, strengthening the ability to work in teams with an emphasis on results.  

Working and learning activities

The main teaching will be based on tutoring sessions in the studio, through workshops, structured presentations and discussions within the course participants.  

Through collaboration and consultation with OBOS and the Living Lab. 

The course also integrates lectures, studio work (groups and individual), and a main project in collaboration with external partners. 

The course has up to 5 thematics which cross disciplinary teams will engage with. 

Being a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through both projects will be presented by means of: 

·     Group and individual mid-term deliverables and presentations  

·     Workshops 

·     Evidencing material 

·     Final prototype/report/exhibition as appropriate for the best dissemination of results and findings 

Details regarding the calendar, main events, deliverables, and evaluation criteria will be described and detailed at the onset of the course. 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)-Pass / failBeing a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through the course will be assessed by means of: • Ability to collaborate • Ability to visualize and communicate findings from insight work • Group and individual mid-term deliverables • Presentations • Final prototype/report/exhibition (Main deliverable). The course consists of a main deliverable that will be developed and defined by the students themselves as most appropriate for the dissemination of findings during the semester. The course will also consist of group and individual deliverables throughout, and students will receive qualitative assessment to identify strengths and weaknesses. The project will have a final presentation, that will be assessed in pass or fail by an external sensor and the course leader. The details for each project regarding deliverables and evaluation criteria will be described in the brief for the project at the beginning of the course.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:-
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Being a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through the course will be assessed by means of: • Ability to collaborate • Ability to visualize and communicate findings from insight work • Group and individual mid-term deliverables • Presentations • Final prototype/report/exhibition (Main deliverable). The course consists of a main deliverable that will be developed and defined by the students themselves as most appropriate for the dissemination of findings during the semester. The course will also consist of group and individual deliverables throughout, and students will receive qualitative assessment to identify strengths and weaknesses. The project will have a final presentation, that will be assessed in pass or fail by an external sensor and the course leader. The details for each project regarding deliverables and evaluation criteria will be described in the brief for the project at the beginning of the course.
Workload activityComment
Attendance Students are expected to attend at least 90% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project, in order to be able to pass the course. The course leader will take attendance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session. She/he will inform the students if are close to failing the course due to lack of attendance. This is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Although the project will be developed in groups, individual deliverables will also be required during the projects. Whilst the course draws on the experience of the external partner involved in developing and delivering this course, there will also be a degree of experimentation and iterative development of new methods during the course. Medical absences won't affect the participation, but they need to be presented on time (not further than 8 days after the absence) to the course leader and to the Student Administration. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment: Students are expected to attend at least 90% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project, in order to be able to pass the course. The course leader will take attendance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session. She/he will inform the students if are close to failing the course due to lack of attendance. This is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Although the project will be developed in groups, individual deliverables will also be required during the projects. Whilst the course draws on the experience of the external partner involved in developing and delivering this course, there will also be a degree of experimentation and iterative development of new methods during the course. Medical absences won't affect the participation, but they need to be presented on time (not further than 8 days after the absence) to the course leader and to the Student Administration. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.

Pages