fbpx 40 615 Living in the City_The Metropolitan Façade | The Oslo School of Architecture and Design

Languages

Start semester

40 615 Living in the City_The Metropolitan Façade

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Living in the City_The Metropolitan Façade
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 615
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2018 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2018 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2018
Maximum number of students: 
24
Person in charge
Neven Mikac Fuchs
Young Eun Choi
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed 7 semesters

Course content

The Guest Professor Studio ‘Space & Technique’ offers an advanced master course in architectural design. In the spring semester 2018 the guest professor in the studio will be English architect Peter St John, from London and Zürich based office Caruso St John Architects. Peter taught at the University of North London, visiting Professor at the University of Bath and ETH in Zürich, visiting critic at the Graduate School of Design at Harvard University. He has been teaching at London Metropolitan University. 
https://www.carusostjohn.com/

+
The project would have a general title like “Living in the City_The Metropolitan Façade”.
To design a mixed use building of medium scale in the centre of the city, of apartments, with another use on the ground floor (shop/café/restaurant?) and (possibly) city offices. The site in Oslo would be special, in an older densely developed central part of the city, in a district of high value, where new buildings are quite unusual. The site should also be in a prominent position, for example a corner on a junction or roundabout, or facing a park or small square. In other words a place in which students would never expect to be able to intervene. The new building would replace an existing building (ideally) of lesser value than its neighbours, with some justification for replacement. Students would work within one particular quarter of the city, and have a choice of sites, so their projects collectively would be a comment on possible changes to the quarter. Ideally there would several sites within view of each other, for example around a city junction. This would have a more interesting spatial effect, but may not be realistic. The new building would be a bit larger (taller) than the existing buildings around it. The project is not about being polite or too contextual. Its about confidence and quality, giving a charge to the place, while still respecting the quality of the place. The sites would not be too large, for example between 1 and 4 decent sized apartments per floor, so that the proportion of the building is vertical and figural. But not towers (because then the façade is a different thing altogether. The shaping of the top is important. 
The main product of the work is a large coloured model at the scale 1.50, plus the design of one apartment (a special apartment, not a utilitarian one), and the detailed design of one façade. The project is not about solving problems or drawing every plan level.
The students work on the project in stages, first on the form of the building on the site, then the character of one apartment and the implications of its organisation the façade, and finally resolve the whole with a detailed model. The project is about how the character of a city is made by the quality of its buildings, especially the facades within a dense city with streets. How facades in the city give a charge to the space in front of them and make public (metropolitan) space. And how an interesting city façade is designed with priorities both from the outside and the inside, for instance, Brussels and Paris 1900-1920, Milan 1920-1960, Hamburg 1930, and Zurich now. Muzio, Hoger, Gaudi, Lasdun and Siza (berlin).
The model is very important because the project should not be a block. It’s a figure with a profile and a form, seen from a number of different directions (crudely, like a statue with a front back and side profile)

Learning outcome

Formulating the independent and prejudice-less thinking about architecture and about working with its constituent material.
Stimulating the individual awareness of todays positions in architecture.
Stimulating the awareness of one’s own architectural position and one’s own attitude toward the work with architecture.

+
After finishing the course, the student should:
- be able to discover and sharpen his/her own working method
- be able to develop principles for structuring of both basic and complex architectural material and develop it into a final project
- be able to develop and structure the architectural knowledge on the base of specific project themes chosen to work with during the studio
- be able to learn how to creatively use architectural research in the work with architecture.
- be able to present and communicate his/her architectural ideas and his/her final project through the appropriate forms of representation, with drawings, models, diagrams, photos, 3Ds, etc.
- benefit from the work with a foreign guest-teacher and from the confrontation with his architectural thinking, knowledge, experience and imagination.  
 

Working and learning activities

The underlying aims of the teaching in the studio will be:
- to create motivation for the analytical thinking and causal architectural decision-making and expression
- to stimulate, cultivate and articulate personal discussion with teachers, as well as open public discourse within the studio, on the base of architectural ideas developed through the project

PROJECT WORK:
The studio-work during the semester will be conducted in 4 steps. The duration of each step will be approximately 1 month.
- the first part of the semester: individual research with open public discussions in the studio
- the second part of the semester: individual work on the project structured in 3 steps in-between 3 public reviews in the studio
+
During the semester, each step would be discussed both independently, as combined with each other and connected into the main project as a whole. In this way, each of the steps will hopefully leave clear traces onto the final project. Weaving the research in and around the main project would lead students to make visible another story, the story of their own position and understanding of architecture. The short assignments or workshops will be introduced during the work.
+
Our particular interest will be to investigate the relationship between architectural structure, materiality and the concept, starting from an idea of architecture that coherently fuses representation and its internal spatial and tectonic qualities. Therefore, beside the drawings, the projects will be investigated and developed with the help of architectural models in different scale, specially big models. They will then be photographed to test the anticipated ideas of the project. The final project will be presented with text, big-scale drawings and models, photographs, renderings, etc.

+
The teaching will consist of the studio-work, the individual and public discussions and table reviews and lectures structured in-between the public reviews. During the semester we could imagine two short study-trips: one trip to Milan in the beginning and another to London for review with Peter St.John.

TOOLS:
- Texts, drawings and models in different scale, photographs and 3D illustrations
- Prepared public discussions and reviews of the individual projects with projections
- Digital- and hand-production of models in different scale will be one of the primary design tools of the studio
- Final project will be presented with the detailed drawings, big models and renderings

LITERATURE:
The pensum- and literature list will be given later.

Curriculum

The teaching will consist of the work in the studio, the individual discussions and desk-crits, case studies, public discussions, seminars, films and lectures, structured in-between 3 public reviews. After the first working phase there will be an organized study-trip to Italy, a kind of project in itself, following the premises of the studio.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failEXAMS AND ASSESMENT METHODS: - the active presence and work on the project in the studio during the whole semester - in the research part of the semester the assessment will focus on: 1. the architectural sensibility and awareness of the architectural problems, 2. the clarity of argumentation, built-up during the process - in the project part of the semester the assessment will be based on: 1. the evaluation of the quality of the project idea, 2. the strength of conversion of idea into an architectural project, 3. the evaluation of the artistic, intellectual and architectural capacity to confront the creative risk involved in the project - the prepared project-material and presence at 3 public reviews - the delivered complete project for the exhibition AHO Works and for the final review 01 – 05.06. 2015 - the studio-work is evaluated with Passed ‚or Not passed, jf. Regulation for Master Studies at AHO‚ pt. 6-14.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:EXAMS AND ASSESMENT METHODS: - the active presence and work on the project in the studio during the whole semester - in the research part of the semester the assessment will focus on: 1. the architectural sensibility and awareness of the architectural problems, 2. the clarity of argumentation, built-up during the process - in the project part of the semester the assessment will be based on: 1. the evaluation of the quality of the project idea, 2. the strength of conversion of idea into an architectural project, 3. the evaluation of the artistic, intellectual and architectural capacity to confront the creative risk involved in the project - the prepared project-material and presence at 3 public reviews - the delivered complete project for the exhibition AHO Works and for the final review 01 – 05.06. 2015 - the studio-work is evaluated with Passed ‚or Not passed, jf. Regulation for Master Studies at AHO‚ pt. 6-14.