Passed foundation level (BA-level) courses at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS. Open to all programs at AHO. Students who have taken courses in service design, systems oriented design or interaction design will have priority.
Recommended previous knowledge:
The course objectives are to learn principles of wicked problems and tools that have been designed for them. The stronger focus will be on the Mess Mapping tool created by a Stanford emeritus researcher Horn (Horn & Weber, 2007). Wicked problems are complex problems such as unemployment, immigration, childhood obesity, sustainability to name a few (Suoheimo et al., 2020). Design tools to address wicked problems are limited (Suoheimo, 2016; 2019), however, Mess Mapping in one of them. This is a central tool of the course that will capacitate students to grapple what different complexities in service design. The aim of the course is for students to learn Mess Mapping and how to apply the approach to service design projects. Together with learning the basics of Mess Mapping students will also consider, via Service Blueprints (or other tools), how the macro level understanding could be brought down to micro and meso levels of services. Students will create and design recommendations on what to consider when making a service blueprint. These recommendations could be designed in a form of a leaflet, video or any other creative way that are contextually relevant in a specific case. There will be discussion and reflection on whether blueprint is the best tool for conveying findings during mess mapping or for context, or if indeed other service design tools could be used to take the macro level down to the service level.
The aim of the course is for students to learn how the mess mapping tool will aid in understanding the macro level of the service design problems that can be wicked, political, involve multiple stakeholders, have several policies and laws that need to be considered. The tool will aid in understanding the root causes, causalities, and interconnectedness of the wicked problems in question, and in turn aid in the dialogue and understanding of the stakeholders that share the challenges or problems in common.
During the mapping sessions, students will learn facilitation skills and how to listen and give space for people to talk and participate. In the end students will learn synthesizing and questioning the complexity in question and understand what possible domino effects an intervention in the system may cause. It will require students to learn to be comfortable with the uncomfortable, not knowing what the end result or deliverables will be but to trust in the process. It is essential to understand that wicked problems have taken decades if not centuries to form and for this reason might need longer timeframes than current service design practice to unmake them or better mitigate the challenge. For this reason, we will touch on ‘transition design’ principles.
With the course being short, we will only make a partial Mess Map, but this will allow for an understanding of the principles of Mess Mapping. Students will create recommendations on how the information gathered could be transferred into practice via Service Blueprinting (or other tool, if found to be more appropriate for the case) in a real context. Students will also learn skills of working in groups and running a design project in a complex context.
The course will consist of group work, where the mapping tool will be experimented with together with external stakeholders (if possible). There will be reading assignments and each student will write a learning diary of the activities they learn during the course.
KNOWLEDGE
SKILLS
GENERAL COMPETENCE
Buchanan, R. (1992). Wicked problems in design thinking. Design issues, 8(2), 5-21.
Ritchey, T. (2013). Wicked problems. Acta morphologica generalis, 2(1).
Rittel, H. W., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy sciences, 4(2), 155-169.
Horn, R. E., & Weber, R. P. (2007). New tools for resolving wicked problems. Mess Mapping and Resolution Mapping Processes. [online accessed April 2016] http://www. strategykinetics. com/New_Tools_ For_Resolving_Wicked_Problems. pdf.
Suoheimo, M. (2019). Strategies and visual tools to resolve wicked problems. The International Journal of Design Management and Professional Practice, 13(2), 25.
Suoheimo, M., Vasques, R., & Rytilahti, P. (2020). Deep diving into service design problems: Visualizing the iceberg model of design problems through a literature review on the relation and role of service design with wicked problems. The Design Journal, 24(2), 231-251.
Suoheimo, M., & Lusikka, T. (2020, August). Process for mapping challenges of cross-border mobility in the Barents region. In International Conference on Design Creativity (pp. 168-177). Design society.
Form of assessment | Grouping | Grading scale | Comment |
---|---|---|---|
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe) | Individual | Pass / fail | The course will consist of one design projects with group and individual deliverables that will receive qualitative assessment to identify strengths and weaknesses. The students will be assessed on the quality of submitted deliverables throughout the course. The student must submit all assignments in the course to receive final assessment. Students are assessed individually also in the group works. The student’s progression throughout the course will be assessed by means of: • Mini Mess Map • Recommendations how to apply the knowledge in a service (blueprint) in a form of a leaflet, video or any other creative way that will make sense in the specific case. • Workshops • Learning diary • Final presentation that will capture the process and the outcomes of the project • PowerPoint or PDF slides for your personal professional portfolio of the case in question • Project management and working/collaborating in groups If a student does not submit these deliverables for whatever reason (medical absences etc.), or if the delivery is too weak, the student can deliver an improved project later in the semester, but must deliver before the end of the course (unless they have obtained an extension from administration). The project will have a final presentation, that will be assessed in pass or fail by an external sensor and the course leader. Note: Whilst group work will be assessed as a whole as to the quality of their deliverables, individuals will be assessed in their contribution to this whole. Students who fail to contribute or show limited contribution or engagement will not pass this course. Therefore, assessment of group dynamics and collaboration will be ongoing throughout the course. |
Workload activity | Comment |
---|---|
Attendance | This is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Although the projects are often developed in groups, individual deliverables will also be required during the projects. Students are expected to attend at least 90% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project, in order to be able to pass the course. This includes workshops, lectures, group sessions and tutoring sessions. The course leader will take attendance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session. The course leader will inform the students if they are close to failing the course, due to lack of attendance. |