fbpx | The Oslo School of Architecture and Design

Languages

Start semester

40 514 Guest Studio

Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
Guest studio
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 514
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2017 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2017 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2017
Maximum number of students: 
24
Person in charge
Neven Mikac Fuchs
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed 6 semesters + knowledge of Rhino

Course content

Architectonic Typologies is guest professor master studio, chair ‘Space and Technique’, concerned with exploring ideas about architectonic space and different techniques of making these ideas possible as real everyday architecture. Technique should be understood here in its double meaning, as tools for imagining and representing spatial ideas and as technical know-how to make them physically present as real architectonic qualities. It is a project oriented studio, where architecture is thought through designing it. In the studio, we are studying different architectonic typologies and themes, apartment houses, museums and galleries, schools, kindergartens, big and small offices, farms, infrastructures, landscapes and urban spaces, and we are working with restore projects – the structures of different scales and meaning that embody the essence of an architectonic space.  We understand the process of design as a research into the nature of architecture.

The studio is a collaborative studio, inviting the most interesting international architects, high level academicians and practitioners, to investigate and renew together with us the methods and representational tools for teaching and production of architecture.  http://www.romogteknikk.aho.no/

The project Architectonic Typologies will be dealing with creating buildings and spaces, starting with the study of the most elementary architectonic elements and typologies, like walls, floors, roofs, windows, courtyards, towers, columns, beams, concrete, timer, etc. 

Each student will develop his own theme on the base of his understanding of these elements, which will be the inspiration for further development of the project. All the parameters of the project, like the site, or no-site, the program and the scale will be chosen individually by each student. The choices will be discussed collectively in the studio. 

Learning outcome

1. Formulating the independent and prejudice-less thinking about architecture and working with its constituent elements, space structure, site, program, façade, building materials, etc.

2. Stimulating the individual awareness of today’s positions in architecture

3. Stimulating the awareness of one's own architectural position and one's own attitude toward the work with architecture

4. Benefit from the work with a foreign guest-teacher and from the confrontation with his architectural thinking, knowledge, experience and imagination.

 

After finishing the course, the student should:

- be able to develop and consciously use his/her own working method

- be able to argue for an individual and specific statement about his/her design aims. This statement is important as starting point, but also as benchmark of every architectural project.

- be able to develop principles for structuring of both basic and complex architectural material and technical skills to develop it into a final project

- be able to develop and structure the architectural knowledge on the base of specific project themes chosen to work with during the studio

- be able to learn how to creatively use architectural research in the work with architecture.

- be able to present and communicate his/her architectural ideas and his/her final project through the appropriate forms of representation, with drawings, models, diagrams, photos, 3Ds, etc. 

Working and learning activities

The main aims of teaching in the studio will be:

- to create motivation to the analytical thinking and the causal architectural expression

- to stimulate, cultivate and articulate personal discussions with teachers, as well as open public discussions within the studio, on the development of the projects

The teaching will consist of the work in the studio, the individual discussions and desk crits, case studies, public discussions, seminaries, films and lectures structured in-between 3 public reviews.

The work will be conducted in 4 steps with three interim reviews plus the final review. On these occasions students have to present the state of their work in a consistent and convincing way. The duration of each step will be approximately 1 month, ending with a public presentation and discussion/critique of the individual work.

Work load will consist of:

- texts, drawings and models, digital and hand-produced, in different scale, photographs and 3D illustrations

- the prepared public discussions and reviews of the individual work

- the final project will be presented with photos, texts, drawings, models and 3D renders

 

Curriculum

Pensum will be presented later.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failForms of examination include following:

- the active presence and work in the studio during the whole semester

the assessment will focus on:

a. student’s architectural sensibility and awareness of architectural problems,

b. the clarity of argumentation, built-up during the process

c. the ability to evaluate the quality of the project idea,

d. the strength of “conversion” of idea into an architectural project,

e. the evaluation of the intellectual and architectural capacity to confront the creative risk involved in the project

f. the developed presentation material and presence at 3 public reviews during the semester

g. the delivered complete project material for the exhibition AHO Works and for the final review.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Forms of examination include following:

- the active presence and work in the studio during the whole semester

the assessment will focus on:

a. student’s architectural sensibility and awareness of architectural problems,

b. the clarity of argumentation, built-up during the process

c. the ability to evaluate the quality of the project idea,

d. the strength of “conversion” of idea into an architectural project,

e. the evaluation of the intellectual and architectural capacity to confront the creative risk involved in the project

f. the developed presentation material and presence at 3 public reviews during the semester

g. the delivered complete project material for the exhibition AHO Works and for the final review.
Workload activityComment
Attendance
Evaluation (mid term)
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:
Workload activity:Evaluation (mid term)
Comment: