fbpx 2020 Høst | Page 5 | The Oslo School of Architecture and Design

Languages

2020 Høst

Start semester

60 527 The Forest

Credits: 
24
Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
The Forest
Course code: 
60 527
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Luis Callejas
Gro Bonesmo
Mattias F Josefsson
Learning outcome

 

Landscape architecture students will learn how subtractive techniques can be powerful design tools for acting on large scale projects.

Architecture students will learn about the difference between designing the landscape and being inspired by the landscape. Architecture students will learn landscape specific design techniques that empower them to design beyond the perceived limits of buildings. 

Students from both fields will discover how the way we model a site has direct implications for the way we design.

Working and learning activities

Individual design projects. A collective exhibition, individual original representations of the forest in the form of drawings, models and text.

Curriculum

After the mountain, the island, and the ocean, we will look into the forest.

As in previous studios, the course will focus on the intersection of architecture and landscape architecture by looking at their shared geographic tropes.

This course is in collaboration with the Yale school of architecture. Some activities, research and reviews are planed to be completed with a group of architecture students at Yale as part of the 2020 Louis Kahn chair.

As illustrated by Franz Heske's writings during the 1930s, practices as mundane as forest management can reflect, if not embody, prevailing religious beliefs and practices. The boreal forest is a cultural landscape that has triggered the imagination of Nordic designers across fields, however, there is still a general lack of attention among designers to the fact that most forests are intensively managed spaces, and as such, objects of design.

This is not a studio about wood, nor about buildings made of wood. It is about the invention of the forest as a cultural landscape, the need for an updated set of representations, and the spatial potential that emerges from more intense wood harvesting in the forests around Oslo. The studio will also question the prevailing urgency to use wood as a dominant material in Scandinavia, not in terms of sustainability, but rather to investigate the cultural significance of future forests if we are indeed moving towards a world built out of wood. As in previous studios the projects can be buildings or landscapes, however the methodology privileges ambiguous  projects that don’t fit clearly within disciplinary boundaries.

The forest as project

We will intentionally focus on two polarized scales, skipping everything in the middle. On one hand the persistent spatial metaphors originated in the studies of forests across different design cultures, while on the other hand, projects of afforestation at territorial scale with with clear nation building agendas, as for example, the afforestation of Israel, or the dark history behind some forestry projects in Germany in the late 1930's under the nationalist call for a religion of nature.

The specific metrics, techniques and efficient principles of forest management will be used as design principles to produce novel spaces around Oslo.

Design:

The projects will be located in the privately owned forests of Normarka, and will be about the edition of the forest to produce space. An architecture of subtraction and edition, to create spaces in what is one of the world's most sophisticatedly managed forests.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Other assessment method, define in comment fieldIndividualPass / failexam is:
Mid review ( interim presentation with drawings and models ) 50%
Final review 50%

Evaluation:

Quality of design 70%
Quality of research 30%
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Other assessment method, define in comment field
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:exam is:
Mid review ( interim presentation with drawings and models ) 50%
Final review 50%

Evaluation:

Quality of design 70%
Quality of research 30%

Start semester

80 519 Field Stations: Lightweight Architecture

Credits: 
24
Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
Field Stations: Lightweight Architecture
Course code: 
80 519
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
18
Person in charge
Andrea Pinochet
Lina Elisabeth Broström
Ane Sønderaal Tolfsen
Required prerequisite knowledge

 

Admission to and passed three years of bachelor level studies at AHO.

Good understanding of written and spoken English

Intermediate to a good level of draughtsmanship

Interest in building large scale models

Course content

Ephemeral building is an attitude. It isn't just about knowing how long individual components will last. It's also about the fact that we don't know today what will be right tomorrow. It takes a certain attitude to be able to ac­cept this: a certain humility regarding the extent to which one's predictions are circumscribed.

 

— Werner Sobeck, The New Less Is More, 2009

Field Stations

This course reflects an interest in investigating structures that have the capacity to operate as frames for a myriad of programs or activities. An observatory of sorts, a field station is by definition a post, camp or place intermittently occupied to accommodate activity. Often located in an outlying area or an area where research or a venture is under way.

Ephemeral Building 

The studio will work with lightness as a framework to build and challenge more permanent and static building solutions. Another way of understanding the concept of lightweight in architecture is to think about ephemeral building —everything that minimizes construction material, doesn't weigh much and, therefore, has special properties.

With this concept in mind the studio wants to investigate the full potential of different materials that have a low environmental impact or that are responsive to the environment.

In the studio, lightweight architecture will be explored through the design of a field station that can conceptually disappear without leaving a trace. 

Assembly and Temporality

Understanding the field station as a small open structure that seeks to witness, sample and host recurring activities, we will seek to understand the complexity of a building’s life cycle, trying to anticipate not just how it will be built and used, but also how it will be maintained and disassembled. 

Starting with the building materials, we will try to answer the following questions: How is a given material processed or transformed to become reliable building elements? How do different elements come together to form a structure and how does that particular arrangement relate to its situation? 

Letting your observation studies guide you in the definition of a new programmatic intention for a contemporary observatory, we will take a deeper look into the assembly process to investigate how regional differences can be part of a more technological and active project, defining its capacity to respond to the environment.

Learning outcome

The project will be looking at how building with an ephemeral or lightweight mindset can guide us towards durable choices regarding the full building process from the extraction of raw material, production of elements, transportation, building technology and how a building can be dismantled. 

The design questions raised by the studio will therefore be addressed through an investigation of material technology and study of the building industry, letting form emerge from an understanding of the material properties, both physical and aesthetic, and the individual ambitions set out by the students. 

Through an in-depth study of a particular material and technological development, participants will gain an understanding of the complexity involved in the realization of a simple work of architecture. We will also address issues relating to resource extraction, division of labor, building ethics and the politics of the construction site.

Working and learning activities

Tapping into architecture’s capacity to synthesize, this studio will engage with ideas about building technology, structure and nature. The studio will work with analytical drawing, model making and experimental characterization techniques. Revisiting the scientific method, we will discuss material science and study the specific and unique qualities of potential building materials in order to understand material properties, structural capacity and position in the industry. 

We will discuss architectural aesthetics and the craft of building as a creative endeavor. What values guide us in the choices of material? With this in mind we will experiment with a varied range of materials (like wood, masonry, stone, earth, water, straw, bamboo, clay, cork, adobe, straw bale, mycelium, new polymers, waste, etc.)

We will work with big models and physical samples, and will embrace technical drawing, budget sheets, schedules and logistics plans, making discussion around labor and organizational systems an important component of the course.

If possible, we will organize visits to places of construction and manufacture.

 

NB! In the event of school closure or limited workshop access in the fall, independent working methods will be set up by the studio in order to address the similar questions regarding lightness in architecture and material technology.

Curriculum

Syllabus will be distributed on the first day of class.

 

  • The New Less is More Interview with Werner Sobek. Something Fantastic. 2009
  • Architect as the Organizer, or The Way The World Works. Eeva-Liisa Pelkonen. Perspecta Vol.45. 2012.
  • Scale as Problem-Architecture as Trap, Adrian Lahoud. Climates Architecture and the Planetary Imaginary. 2016.
  • Introduction to Forensis, Eyal Weizman. Forensic Architecture. 2016.
  • Can you Believe the Weather We're Having, Phu Hoang. Climates Architecture and the Planetary Imaginary. 2016.
  •  Is Geo-logy the new umbrella for all the sciences? Hints for a neo-Humboldtian university. Bruno Latour. Lecture at Cornell University, 25th October 2016. The Year In Weather, Keller Easterling. Artforum. 2017.
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

Start semester

60 528 In Transit: Contingency City

Credits: 
24
Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
In Transit: Contingency City
Course code: 
60 528
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
16
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level courses (bachelor level).                                      Open for master level architecture and landscape architecture students. 

Course content

 

The In Transit Studio

The In Transit Studio aims at preparing students to conduct their architectural investigations through engaging in current, complex topics. Students will develop their design skills by studying and proposing spatial and site-specific solutions to situations caused by global challenges. Through practice-based research, the In Transit Studio aims at developing a deeper understanding of the fundamentals of architecture and to (re-)discover the role of the architect as a societal agent of change.

How the world will have changed after enduring the COVID-19 pandemic remains to be seen. But we do know that measures for stopping the spread of the virus have dramatically affected our everyday lives. The #stayhome instruction, imposed globally in different ways during the spring of 2020, has for some people increased the feeling of home as a safe place. For others the isolation has heightened the feeling of loneliness and for many, because of complicated family relations, home isolation has felt like being in confinement with no escape. The value of public spaces, our common arenas for social and physical interaction, has been reaffirmed – now illustrated by the collective experience of involuntary solitary or extreme social coexistence.

 

Contingency Planning

Contingency is a future event or circumstance which is possible but cannot be predicted with certainty. To ensure the safety of their citizens and to uphold critical functions and infrastructure in the event of an emergency, governments, local authorities, businesses, and other societal actors 

need to plan for the unknown by determining prioritized actions that can be rapidly implemented. A contingency plan is also sometimes called a Plan B. 

However, the spatial response to emergencies is quite often improvised. Structures are hastily put together, often with no added value for a community (with money spent instead of invested). In theory, temporary structures are put up when needed and then removed when not in use. The set-up and closure of such sites is far more complex. The high numbers of people seeking sanctuary in Europe in 2015 demonstrated that the collective emergency preparedness of European countries fell short. The political decision to prevent people from coming to Norway in the subsequent years, also meant that the improvised solutions that had been built during the alleged crisis, had to be scaled down shortly after.

What if instead the architecture, landscape architecture and urban design could be better integrated in contingency planning? The preferred option, Plan A, with purpose-built, multi-performing structures used for everyday activities, and designed and built to also withstand cycles of extreme use?

 

The Collective Center                                                                                                                                

A Collective center is defined - in emergency contexts - as pre-existing buildings used for temporary accommodation and provision of assistance and protection of displaced persons. Purpose-built collective centers are rare. Even in Norway, asylum and reception centers (one type of a collective center) are often located in buildings unsuitable for habitation and sometimes placed in so-called leftover spaces. Most collective centers are used only for a couple of days or weeks, in other contexts they may be used for a decade or more.

With new types of threats, with climate change, and displacement being a constant phenomenon – either because of internal movement or caused by (forced) migration – what does the 2020 version of the Collective Center look like? Where are they placed in our communities? How can these centers be turned into positive places with added value for a neighborhood? The studio will focus on the architecture and location of a Collective Center, as one of many possible outputs of contingency planning for emergencies. We will use the Oslo Metropolitan area as our case. 

 

Memories of the future

In the (recent) history of architecture, there are many examples of architects and designers who were planning for an unknown future, where advanced architecture and complex societal questions were interdependent – and called both radical and utopian. The studio will study the ideas and concepts from the future-oriented past – from Cedric Price and Buckminister Fuller to Archigram and Superstudio. What can we learn from studying these pioneers and their optimistic visions of a collectively oriented urban life?

Learning outcome

The student will learn how explore and develop architectural design for extreme and complex situations. The student will gain insight into real-time, global challenges– and the role of the architect in this context. The studio will provide knowledge about civil protection, global humanitarian affairs, the United Nations, and national & local authorities responsible for contingency planning, emergency response, displacement management, and integration initiatives.

Working and learning activities

The main output of this semester is to design a Collective Center (individually or in teams). The studio will develop a set of architectural projects that together will constitute a (part of a-) contingency plan for Oslo. Each student will determine functions and programs needed for his/her/their Collective Center(s), based on input provided throughout the course and found through self-study.

Determining the location(s) of the Collective Center(s) is an important part of the semester brief. The studio will study and compare different sites (neighborhoods, plots) through urban profiling exercises. The studio will use qualitative methods for studying and evaluating the everyday life of public spaces, buildings and other structures in a chosen neighborhood, to uncover the causes and dynamics of social behavior (or exclusion), (lack of) diversity, and (in-)equality in the use and access of these spaces, and how the Collective Center can reflect, amplify or improve these conditions. 

 

Excursions: The hidden places of the Oslo Metropolitan area.  

Form of assessment

Deliverables throughout - and at the end of the course - shall include imaginative and innovative, yet concrete project proposals with architectural designs that are carefully presented through models, drawings and visualizations. Students are expected to work at both a (strategic) city level and at a detailed architectonic scale.The student needs to answer all assignments and be present at all presentations to pass the course (depending on how the situation evolves, online solutions may also be considered). If a student is not able to be present his/her/their project or be present at scheduled reviews, a medical leave note must be presented. All answered assignments and presentations are subject to an overall assessment - with an emphasis on the presentation of the final design project, which will be evaluated by external juror(s) and responsible teachers.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

Start semester

80 517 Re-Store: Prefab

Credits: 
24
Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
Re-Store: Prefab
Course code: 
80 517
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
15
Person in charge
Erik Fenstad Langdalen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Compleeted foundation courses at AHO or equivalent at other institution. 

Course content

This studio is about prefabricated and mass-produced architecture: its history, cultural value, spread and popularity, technological properties and spatial potential. The assignment is to investigate existing prefabricated building structures, using the conceptual framework of experimental preservation to explore their reuse, transformation and preservation.

Prefabrication is written into the DNA of modern architecture. A great number of mass produced materials, building components, structural systems and entire buildings are constantly being shipped around the world. Traditional on-site craftsmanship has been replaced by assembly lines, the relationship between site and building is profoundly redefined, and the idea of a regionally anchored architecture is challenged by an architecture that is interchangeable and global.  

Yet prefabrication is not a new idea. Medieval builders seems to have used prefabrication extensively when construction Gothic buildings. During the 16th century there are several known instances of prefabricated architectural elements being shipped around in Renaissance Europe. The expanding colonial powers of the 17th and 18th centuries brought prefabricated “kit-houses” to their new settlements in America, Africa, Asia and Australia. “The industrial revolution” of the 19th century introduced complex building systems of cast iron and reinforced concrete on a large scale, and for the pioneers of the modern movement of the 20th century, prefabrication became an integral part of a new ideological and aesthetical project. The rebuilding of Europe after WWII called for a massive industrialisation of the building industry, and prefabricated architecture has since the 1960s ruled the world.

 

Preservation deals with questions of permanence, authenticity and authorship; traditionally a way of placing buildings chronologically in history, anchor them to one particular site, defining their outer parameters and naming their authors. Mass-produced architecture challenges this: it belongs everywhere and nowhere; it is temporal, it can be assembled, disassembled and reassembled over time, it is by nature limitless as it can be repeated and expanded, and it has multiple authors. The studio will investigate how something generic can become specific – and maybe even poetic? – when skilfully used and responding to distinctive requirements.

 

There is an urgent demand for new ideas on how to restore, reuse and transform the great number of prefabricated structures built in the 20th century. The studio encourages the students to develop new methods of preservation through an experimental practice involving survey procedures, writing, drawing, physical model building, computer modelling, representational techniques etc. The goal is then to develop comprehensive and advanced architectural solutions to the studio’s given task.

 

It will be a twofold semester:

In the first phase the students will investigate a number of significant prefabricated structures and acquire knowledge of their history, their characteristics and potential for reuse, transformation and preservation. The students will gather historical documents, produce drawings and build models of the buildings.

 

In the second and most extensive phase, each student will develop an individual architectural project based on the research conducted in phase 1. The studio encourages the students to pursue diverse approaches, from speculative experiments to concrete investigations of building engineering physics, materials, structure etc.

 

There will be a lecture and film series running through the whole semester on the history of mass production and prefabrication, its cultural dissemination and popularity, on materials and structural systems and on contemporary preservation strategies.

 

Excursion: to be confirmed

Teachers: Erik Langdalen and Ingrid Dobloug Roede

Learning outcome

The students shall acquire extensive knowledge of the history, the technology and the spatial potential of mass-produced and prefabricated architecture. They will be introduced to the history and the contemporary discourse of preservation, and learn how to apply this knowledge in the development of a concrete architectural project. The students will learn methods and acquire skills how to survey, value-assess and intervene with existing architecture and prepare them for a professional practice within reuse, transformation and preservation.  

Working and learning activities

Teaching will mainly be through weekly desk-crits and monthly pin-ups in addition to the lecture-series running throughout the whole semester. Studio-meetings will be held on a regular basis for discussions and comments.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

40 301 Body & Space Morphologies : Architecture & Film XVII - Any Boarded Stories V

Credits: 
6
Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
Body & Space Morphologies : Architecture & Film XVII - Any Boarded Stories V
Course code: 
40 301
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
12
Person in charge
Rolf Gerstlauer
Required prerequisite knowledge
  • This elective course is reserved for the students signing up to the 40 533 Body & Space Morphologies : LISTA – Field-Studio III.
  • If you are uncertain about what the above statement implies, please do contact the study administration or the teaching body of this course before you sign up to it.
Course content

INTRODUCTION:

Body & Space Morphologies: Content, Overall Aims and Methods

Body and Space Morphologies is a research-based teaching program placed in the field of Architecture & Culture studies. Dedicated to Phenomenology in Architecture, the program offers Trans-Disciplinary master studios and elective courses in explorative architectural and pre-architectural making, sensing and thinking.

From The Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Phenomenology (2012, Dan Zahavi, ed.):
“Phenomenology shares the conviction that the critical stance proper to philosophy requires a move away from a straightforward metaphysical or empirical investigation of objects to an investigation of the very framework of meaning and intelligibility that makes any such straightforward investigation possible in the first place. It precisely asks how something like objectivity is possible in the first place.”

Our attempt is to partake in the discourse on the Phenomenology of Architecture by working and studying Architectural Phenomenology outside of the Conventions of Architecture. In theory, this can mean a free-thinking, and to some degree also a “free-making” and/or “free-looking”, yet in the realm of our studios it means the making of a dedicated Artistic Research which is looking for the Creation of a Material Practice in which the student can gain a certain expertise in and through which the discourse on the Phenomenology of Architecture can be tried on – if it not already is embodied by the material itself.

We aim at preparing and enabling students to conduct their own investigation into Architectural Phenomenology understood as a Research Creation; a working mode creating an inspired Material Practice “attuned to process rather than the communication of outputs or products” (https://thepedagogicalimpulse.com/research-methodologies/). We consider this to be the Artistic Parallel to both Traditional Scholarly Research and Common Architectural Design Practice.

The Body & Space Morphologies Master Studios for autumn 2020:

  • LISTA - Field-Studio #III (24 ects) - the master studio connected to this elective course - see separate course description
  • CATHARSIS – Acting and The Collective #X (24 ects) - see separate course description

The Body & Space Morphologies Elective Course for autumn 2020 (reserved for LISTA - Field-Studio students):

  • ARCHITECTURE & FILM - any Boarded Stories #V (6 ects)

 

SPECIFICS FOR AUTUMN 2020:

ARCHITECTURE & FILM XVII – ANY BOARDED STORIES V:

Architecture & Film wants to investigate in and produce competence within the subject of The Production and Representation of Body and Space Morphologies and/or Architectural Phenomenology in Film.

The Autumn 2020 course entitled “ANY Boarded Stories” - the fifth take on this topic that works on performativity, performance and performance studies - is a complementary study to the artistic research the students conduct in the LISTA environment when they sign up to the studio course Body & Space Morphologies : LISTA – Field-Studio III.

The aim of the course is to provide students with the tools (video and film-making / editing) needed to deploy complementary ways of working and means of creative investigations that make, demonstrate or narrate a high degree of third-party readability – a dialogue between the above-mentioned artistic research works’ inherent qualities and how those qualities through film/video connect to issues, phenomena and/or subjects in the world.

 

Learning outcome

For the ARCHITECTURE & FILM Studio (as part of the LISTA - Field-Studio III):

Architecture & Film students discover, retrieve and nourish the discourse on phenomenology of architecture from an immediate and impulsive response, through intuitive and reflective filmmaking, by ways of approaching an environment, and spending time with its inhabitants.

After completing the course - and through experimental film-making -, the student should have:

Knowledge of

  • the basics in phenomenology of architecture and the various practices that exist within (and that can become part of) architectural phenomenology

  • the basics in affordance theory and the theories concerning objecthood and/or object relations as means to fuel and reflect upon a material practice and/or artistic research in the field of architecture

  • the basics in performance and performance studies that make body & space morphologies: ways of making, looking at, discussing and seeing/understanding qualia and perception in the working of architecture

  • the basics in disability studies and neurodiversity studies as the necessary activist movements working and re-defining the human condition from “all the world’s a stage” (Shakespeare) towards for all of the human spectrum with its diverse behavior

  • the basics of performativity, language and speech acts as the tools that can add value to the making and a work – but that not necessarily must seek to replace the issues at stake in a work or a thing

  • the foundational preparations for an advanced visual experimental architectural design research through the work on, and manufacturing of, moving imagery

Skills in

  • finding, developing and/or embracing initiatives for the making of an inspired, explorative and imaginative artistic research through the media of film and/or video

  • conducting this artistic research with the desire to make or pursue a feature film containing, or inviting for, reflections in phenomenology of architecture / architectural phenomenology

  • deploying film-making as a particular means of creative investigation that makes, demonstrate or narrates a dialogue between works, behaviour environment and spectator

  • maintaining a personal diary of the making that can be worked into documents of the making aiming at a third-party readability

  • through film-making approaching environments, situations and discussions phenomenological and applying and recognizing performativity in speech and action as productive means from which to provoke and receive social employed knowing

Competence in

  • approaching and acting on impulse with all sorts of material, objects, environments and/or events and gaining valuable experience and film/video footage from this

  • conceiving of and presenting/communicating unique architectural content/research through a visual material and the phenomena or conditions contained and experienced in it

  • understanding the mechanisms and rhetoric of systems of oppression, learned behavior, eugenics and stigma that are un-productive and unsustainable (in the field of architecture as well as in the systems we call architecture)

  • developing and/or pursuing life-long initiatives for a material practice in architectural phenomenology that is independent of, and/or adaptable to, any kind of professional commission

  • not knowing a thing, but having the passion, dedication, endurance and imagination to wanting to get to know it

 

Gerstlauer, Dind, Pilskog, Skjeldsøy, Xu - AHO, April 2020

Working and learning activities

Organization, Workload and Activities

Exercises in video-sketching and video-editing make up weekly studies in which students experiment with film/video-making to strengthen their awareness for film as a media with the capacity to influence, further understand and develop architectural and otherwise performative or kinetic body, environments and space. Aiming at becoming a filmic investigation as a self-study about the making of an artistic research in the LISTA environment, the final exercise during the elective course week will search to produce or create kinetic architectural space / or spatial narratives on video in the length of a feature film that can be published.

All reviews/discussions take place in the office of Stiv Kuling AS in Farsund/Lista - students not present in Lista on Tuesdays are reviewd and discussed on ZOOM. The elective course week is organized as a seminar / workshop (online and/or in situ in Lista) in which we discuss and craft a final film.

The final films in feature length are meant to make and support the argument for a future LISTA Research-Creation Project.

Curriculum

The curriculum/syllabus of the course is taught online through the Moodle-platform and starts with a brief historical, theoretical and philosophical discussion on space in general, and on the perception of kinetic representation of architectural space in particular – be it on film, literature, in the arts or in religion etc...

The Body and Space Morphologies studios collaborate with capacities in other fields of the Humanities (and the Science) providing us with the Trans-Disciplinary syllabus (lectures, readings and field-studies / excursions) necessary to individually and collectively ponder and reflect on Phenomenology in Architecture; the Human Condition and the Creative Act it is to make and conceive of Relational Objects or Architectural Phenomenology.

Teachers

Rolf Gerstlauer, professor, architect and multimedia artist/researcher at The Oslo School of Architecture and Design, AHO. Head of the Body and Space Morphologies research and teaching program. Maintains an artistic practice together with Dind and collaborates with her in implementing aspects of Disability and Neurodiversity Studies into the teachings of the Body and Space Morphologies studios. Teaches the Catharsis studio autumn 2020 (see separate course description).

Julie Valentine Dind, performer/artist/phd-student, Theatre Arts and Performance Studies, Brown University, Providence/USA. Dind’s scholarly work provides all the Body and Space Morphologies studios with an updated syllabus on Performance and Performance Studies, Disability Studies and the Neurodiversity Movement. The Body and Space Morphologies studios serve as laboratory in which this work is sought to be implemented into architectural education – and architecture per se.

Jan Gunar Skjeldsøy & Anders Eik Pilskog, architects, Stiv Kuling AS, Farsund/Norway. Skjeldsøy and Pilskog, both former AHO students, are long-term collaborators to the Body and Space Morphologies studios and since 2019 also our teaching assistants. Together they sign responsible to run and teach the LISTA Field-Studio and the Architecture & Film elective course for autumn 2020. The weekly Tuesday sessions on the works in the Architecture & Film elective course take place in their office in Farsund (and are streamed online on ZOOM).

Wenkai Xu, did her Catharsis studio diploma thesis "A House for me and my animals" in January 2019. She is the Catharsis studio teaching assistant for autumn 2020 and works as alumnus with the continuation of her project, inspires the studio and together with Gerstlauer co-supervises the diploma works.

Recommended Literature and Mandatory Readings

The recommended reading list is shared with the Body & Space Morphologies master studios CATHARSIS - Acting and The Collective X and LISTA - Field-Studio III. The distinct readings (curriculum) for the Architecture & Film elective course are handed out weekly on the Moodle-platform.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / failIndividual artistic research work: On each of the ten Tuesday course days, the self-study (video footage captured throughout the week) is discussed in plenum. The material handed in for that weekly discussion consists of between 1-20 video-sketches and a short text.

The final seminar and workshop week runs from Monday to Friday. Each student works on her/his own final-film and a written critical reflection on what the film makes and presents.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Individual artistic research work: On each of the ten Tuesday course days, the self-study (video footage captured throughout the week) is discussed in plenum. The material handed in for that weekly discussion consists of between 1-20 video-sketches and a short text.

The final seminar and workshop week runs from Monday to Friday. Each student works on her/his own final-film and a written critical reflection on what the film makes and presents.

60 407 The Found and the Constructed: Image as Model and Model as Image

Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
The Found and the Constructed: Images as Model and Models as Image
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
60 407
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
12
Person in charge
Mattias F Josefsson
Required prerequisite knowledge

Admission to AHO and successful completion of three years bachelor level studies (180 ECTS). The course is for both master students in architecture and landscape architecture.

Course content

In the Japanese perspective, the in-between, or Ma, is the interval between two objects or spaces. For this course, this means there is an opening, a gap in all images (or series of images) to appropriate a new type of reading (spectrum). We will use this term and its understanding in order to discuss the dialogue that occurs between multiple objects (or images), and use this as a catalyst for a critical investigation of the complex relationships between space and its representations in photography and (of) models. 

To further elaborate this we would look at the japanese word Ku meaning the great void or the emptiness that can not be understood by the intellect, but rather has been triggered by the intuition or the subconscious. By using found images that do not initially belong together as a point of departure, the course follows the trajectory of André Breton who described Surrealism as “the chance meeting on a dissecting-table of a sewing-machine and an umbrella”.  

The typical causality between photography and architecture often starts with a three-dimensional space that is to be transformed into a two-dimensional image. But what if the tables are turned? In this course the students will construct and photograph models, based on found photographs.

Learning outcome

This course aims, to open up a dialog for the students in found images, to strengthen their critique and analyse of images as a whole. These readings, should be reinterpreted in the making of a object (model), that are photographed in the studio as part of the curriculum. Following learning outcomes could be expected;

  1. strengthen the students understanding and reading of photography.

  2. trigger a usage (and reading) of found images (a number of them) as reference for making a new intrepretation of its content

  3. photographing objects in a controlled studio environment

Working and learning activities

The course will consist of lectures, technical tutorials, readings and workshops in the photostudio. Students are expected to present and discuss their photographs among peers and to contribute to the course’s collective environment. Final submission will be a body of work consisting of found images and a number of images of objects (models).

Curriculum

 

The students will get a reading list on the first day of the course.

 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failThe assessment will be based on participation and presentation in the course, the individual photographs and the presentation in the final review.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The assessment will be based on participation and presentation in the course, the individual photographs and the presentation in the final review.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThe weekly workshops and the elective week requires full participation.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:The weekly workshops and the elective week requires full participation.

70 501 Industrial Design 1: Technoform

Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
Industridesign 1: Teknoform 1
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 501
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Steinar Killi
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level (BA-level) courses at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS.

Course content

Technoform is an advanced course in industrial design dealing with the interaction between new technology and advanced form generation. The course builds on the legacy of industrial design both in Norway and Scandinavia, aesthetic approaches are explored in a cultural context within a technological frame. This is approached through two extensive iterations. First an incremental viable solution that builds on and refine solutions already available. Then a more radical proposition within the same theme that requires an even more creative and inventive process. The outcome of the course will be physical products.

Learning outcome

Knowledge

By the completion of the course the student shall have knowledge about:

  • perform a design process for physical products within to paradigms; as an iteration and through recontextualisation. The first part would typically be an incremental process while the second pursues on a process that aims for more radical innovations.

Skills

By the completion of the course the student shall have the ability to:

  • work and research through new manufacturing trends, that could be the foundation for advanced form-generation
  • to use methods like Peer Creative development, backcasting and possibility driven design
  • sketching, mock up building and CAD are extensively trained during the course

Competence

By the completion of the course the student shall:

  • have increased their tacit competence in performing a design process
  • be able to perform design processes that is not human centered driven
  • be able to utilize form developing methods within a technological frame
Working and learning activities

Workshops, lectures, individual and in groups. Peer feedback is a core method in the course.

Curriculum

Curriculum will be presented at the course start and will consist of articles that can be downloaded from the Internet.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failThe course has 2 modules with 2 main deliveries/studio projects. Both modules must be passed in order to pass the course.

If the student fails the first module, it is possible to supplement this before the final assessement.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The course has 2 modules with 2 main deliveries/studio projects. Both modules must be passed in order to pass the course.

If the student fails the first module, it is possible to supplement this before the final assessement.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThe semester has an expected high general attendance from the students, particurlarly at lectures and workshops.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:The semester has an expected high general attendance from the students, particurlarly at lectures and workshops.

70 502 Interaction Design 1: Tangible Interactions

Full course name in Norwegian Bokmål: 
Interaksjonsdesign 1: Tangible Interactions
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 502
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2020 Autumn
Assessment semester: 
2020 Autumn
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2020
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Nicholas Stevens
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level (BA-level) courses at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS.

Useful Skills

This course builds on some interaction prototyping skills, such as arduino, learnt in the undergraduate course at AHO. Knowledge of this and simple electronics will be very helpful, but is not a requirement.

Course content

Interaction Design 1 - extends the students skills in the world of interaction design, focusing on core skills and materials used in designing physical and digital interactions. The course embraces and explores the creative opportunities made possible by recent developments in physical computing, sensor technologies and mobile devices, to consider physical everyday objects (embedded with switches, sensors and microcontrollers) as augmented interfaces for controlling digital experiences.

This is a practice-led course, starting with a series of short workshops dealing with a range of physical interaction technologies and approaches that lead into larger projects. Students will have the opportunity to work with Arduino microcontrollers, smartphones, Processing code and a broad range of sensors for prototyping and design-testing. The practical aspects of the course will be complemented by a series of lectures/talks and workshops by a range of practitioners and specialists in the field.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

Students will:

  • Get an overview of research and projects within the field of physical computing and the history of tangible interactions.
  • Get an overview of the approaches, issues and challenges faced by designers in the field.
  • Gain an understanding of historical and current technologies and practical applications.
  • Develop a critical framework and approach for the analysis and discussion of work in the field. 

SKILLS
Students will:

  • Extend their skills in electronics and Arduino. All students will be taught methods and tools to make working physical prototypes, and gain practical abilities with electronics.
  • Explore and practice interaction design methodologies, embodied interaction, realtime interaction and social computing and iterations in a physical context.
  • Design  experiential interactive objects with a focus on engaging experiences for communication, education and play.

GENERAL COMPETENCE 
Students will:

  • Gain the ability to explore and understand connections between interaction design and the other design disciplines.
  • Further develop the ability to continuously iterate and explore concepts in order to refine them.
  • Further develop regular design attributes such as curiosity and experimental, inquisitive outlooks.
Working and learning activities

Core components of the course are exploration and developing experiential prototypes of concepts. These are developed during the course by number of smaller projects that culminate in a larger final project at the end of the semester. The majority of the work will be done as pairs (different pairs for each project) with some projects of individual work and others of larger groups. Projects typically have multiple presentations throughout in order to allow students to see and comment on each others work.

Typical weeks will have a presentation, possibly a lecture or workshop and then 1 or 2 opportunities for mentoring. Some projects may require a more intensive period with longer set hours during the week. This will be outlined at the beginning of the semester. The remaining time is able to be utilised as the student feels appropriate in order to develop the project, however it is encouraged that the majority of the time is spent working from the class studio in order to develop an inspiring and encouraging environment.

Curriculum

Shaping things - Bruce Sterling

Radical Technologies - Adam Greenfield

Where the action is - Paul Dourish

Making things talk - Tom Igoe

Digital by Design - Troika

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Exercise RequiredStudents need to present and submit all projects (3-6) in order to be assessed for the course. Students will be informed at the completion of each project as to wether they have any out standing submissions. If students do not submit these deliverables for what ever reason ( medical absences etc) they can deliver later in the semester, but must deliver before the final project commences (unless they have obtained an extension from administration).

If any students have difficulties or conflicts in working within their pair or group, they need to inform the course responsible and we can arrange a solution.
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Exercise
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Required
Comment:Students need to present and submit all projects (3-6) in order to be assessed for the course. Students will be informed at the completion of each project as to wether they have any out standing submissions. If students do not submit these deliverables for what ever reason ( medical absences etc) they can deliver later in the semester, but must deliver before the final project commences (unless they have obtained an extension from administration).

If any students have difficulties or conflicts in working within their pair or group, they need to inform the course responsible and we can arrange a solution.
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentGroupPass / failThe final project will be graded pass/fail by an external assessor and this results in the grade for the course.

Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Group
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The final project will be graded pass/fail by an external assessor and this results in the grade for the course.

Pages