fbpx 2021 Vår | Page 4 | The Oslo School of Architecture and Design

Languages

2021 Vår

70 401 Interactive Spaces and Environments

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Interaktive rom og miljøer
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 401
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Lise Amy Hansen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level coures (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS. Open to all programmes at AHO.

Course content

The course looks at an expanding overlap between interaction design, architecture and media arts, to explore how the ideas and methods of interaction design can be applied in larger environments and spaces. The course investigates emerging trends in responsive spaces and installations, environments and interactive architecture, focusing on larger scale experiences, using physical spaces as the arena for interaction. These investigations will look beyond the direct point and click‐style interactions to less direct forms.

Interactive Spaces and Environments is aimed at both design and architecture students, working in cross‐disciplinary collaboration, and aims to foster thinking and designing beyond the material object, towards the experimental and performative.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

The students will

  • get an overview of a broad range of existing work and theories in the fields of sensate space, interactive architecture, immersive environments and digital installation art.
  • gain a grounding in basic sensor and interactive technologies and how they can be used to create reactive and interactive experiences.
  • build a theoretical and practical framework for how people will experience such intervention.

SKILLS

The students will

  • be able to use tools and methods for prototyping interaction concepts and problem

GENERAL COMPETANCE

The students will 

  • be able to utilize knowledge and skills (as defined above) in an independent manner in different situations and collaborations, within and across disciplines.
Working and learning activities

Different workshops and projects to be arranged according to activity plan.During the final project and exam week, it is expected that the students are participating in a bigger group work building an experimental and interactive room/environment. The project needs to be documented with a short, written report. Several smaller modules will be carried out during the course, some individual and some in groups. One of the moduls shall result in a written text. All deliveries throughout the course will be evaluated accordingly.

Curriculum

Recommended reading:

Grau, O. (2003). Virtual art: from illusion to immersion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Fox, Michael & Kemp, Miles (2009) Interactive Architecture. Princeton Architectural Press.

Ihde, Don (2010) Embodied Technics. Automatic Press / VIP.

Novak, Marcos (1991) ‘Liquid Architectures in Cyberspace’, Cyberspace: First Steps. (PDF)

Shepard, Mark (2011) Sentient City. MIT press.

Schwartzman, Madeline (2011) See Yourself Sensing – redfining human perception.  Black Dog Publishing, London/UK.

Bullivant, L. (2005).4dspace: interactive architecture. London: Wiley‐Academy.

Bullivant, L. (2007) 4dsocial: interactive design environments. London: Wiley.

Noel, S., Rucki, E., & Freyer, C. (2008) Digital by design: crafting technology for products and environments. London: Thames & Hudson.

Fox, M. and Kemp, M. (2009) Interactive Architecture. Princeton University Press

Roosegaarde, D. (2010) Interactive Landscapes. Amsterdam.

NAi Bullivant, L. (2006) Responsive Environments: Architecture, art and design. London: V&A Contemporary.

Uexküll, J. v. (1936). Niegeschaute Welten: die Umwelten meiner Freunde : ein Erinnerungsbuch. Berlin: Fischer.

 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failEach student is expected to conduct research on interactive spaces and environments in relation to their own field of interest. Evaluation will be based on the following elements in percentage: 80% Design projects, presentations, online deliverables, workshops and appropriate presentation material for the end of term AHO‐works exhibition. Projects will be assessed for their creativity, expression, innovation, usability and appropriateness of design. 20% Evaluative report.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Each student is expected to conduct research on interactive spaces and environments in relation to their own field of interest. Evaluation will be based on the following elements in percentage: 80% Design projects, presentations, online deliverables, workshops and appropriate presentation material for the end of term AHO‐works exhibition. Projects will be assessed for their creativity, expression, innovation, usability and appropriateness of design. 20% Evaluative report.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThe semester has an expected 80% general attendance and a 90% attendance at lectures and workshops. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Group work
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:The semester has an expected 80% general attendance and a 90% attendance at lectures and workshops. It must be expected that parts of or all lecturing and tutoring will be digital according to general Covid-19 restrictions. Digital presence is expected in the same manner as physical presence.
Workload activity:Group work
Comment:

Start semester

40 641 Multistory buildings

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Multistory buildings
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 641
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
24
Person in charge
Bente Kleven
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed 3 years of architectural studies

Course content

An important aim for the Multistory Buildings studio course is to explore, study and play with the architectural potential of the loadbearing structure of a building in terms of materiality, design and how the structure can play an active role in framing good spaces for different use.

The first part of the semester will deal with investigation and research of actual structural materials and configuration of loadbearing elements for multistory buildings. These studies will include interesting historical and contemporary architectural examples, and inspiring student projects.

The architectural studies will be concluded in an elaborate and detailed semester project that emphasizes architectural qualities that make the building attractive to future users in the longest possible time perspective.

Therefore, the building will be developed with respect to cultural, social, and environmental sustainability and it should be designed with respect to diversity and flexibility, and include spaces that can be furnished to suit changing needs.

The building shall include a sustainable structural organization of rooms, construction and exterior walls. The structural elements should play a significant role for the architectural quality of the building. The building's vital parts need not to be replaced, but must be serviceable for decades. The principles of ventilation, water and drainage must be studied and specified.

Special attention should be paid to the climate shell and daylight openings.

The building should be prepared for a mix use program.

Learning outcome

Knowledge about:
- how to explore, create and organize good architectural space for different programs in a given context.
- how to deal with different structural materials and loadbearing principles
- different principles for organization and design of vertical communication space and space for service-/technical equipment
- different building envelopes physical structure and materiality
Skills:
Being able to discuss, consider and explore:
- spatial and tactile qualities within a holistic architectural concept.
- various structural materiality and principles impact on architectural quality customized for different use and program for a building over time.
- architectural qualities and possibilities of different organization and design of vertical communication space for users and service
- a building envelope design
- architectural expression and materiality in relation to an actual location context.
Being able to document and present a conclusive and comprehensive and sustainable architectural project on an actual plot through excellent illustrations and a physical model.

General competence:
Being able to apply the acquired knowledge about structures, vertical communication spaces and building envelope into a sustainable building project with great architectural qualities usable for different programs. Get skills in discussing, evaluating and exploring the actual architectural topics.

Working and learning activities

The studio will be carried through with a main emphasis on architectural projects to be completed in groups of 2 students. Project material is expected to be detailed using digital tools, as well as small and largescale models. Preliminary sketching and development of ideas is to be done using analogue tools.
Otherwise, the course includes various activities:
• initial subtasks on current topics
• theme-oriented lectures
• private and group input / lectures and discussions
• inspection of relevant local projects
• reviews every second week
It is possible to inform the study administration by an e-mail the name of your fellow student you plan to co-work with when you sign up for the course.
Oppmøte til undervisning
A general attendance of minimum 80% is required.
- Attendance at lectures is required.
- Participation in individual or group supervision is required, adapted to individual needs.
- Participation in workshops and reviews is required to pass.
- Development, presentation, and review of a completed project design is required to pass.
The student must attend all project reviews. Final project presentations will be assessed as passed/failed by an internal and external examiner after a final review. There will be made a written evaluation.
Mandatory attendance at all project reviews and active participation in discussions around the course different topics at lectures and other arrangements.

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Annet - spesifiser i kommentarfeltet Not requiredA general attendance of minimum 80% is required. - Attendance at lectures is required. - Participation in individual or group supervision is required, adapted to individual needs. - Participation in workshops and reviews is required to pass. - Development, presentation, and review of a completed project design is required to pass. The student must attend all project reviews. Mandatory attendance at all project reviews and active participation in discussions around the course different topics at lectures and other arrangements.
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Annet - spesifiser i kommentarfeltet
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Not required
Comment:A general attendance of minimum 80% is required. - Attendance at lectures is required. - Participation in individual or group supervision is required, adapted to individual needs. - Participation in workshops and reviews is required to pass. - Development, presentation, and review of a completed project design is required to pass. The student must attend all project reviews. Mandatory attendance at all project reviews and active participation in discussions around the course different topics at lectures and other arrangements.
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

Start semester

40 642 Positions - Coexistence IV: LOVE

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Positions - Coexistence IV: LOVE
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 642
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Lisbeth Funck
Course content

COEXISTENCE IV: LOVE is the fourth and final semester in Studio Position´s course series Coexistence. In the spring of 2021 the studio will continue the discussion on coexistence and how it can be investigated and materialised in architecture - architecture understood as both an autonomous structure and as a social space related to a particular site – fictional or real. 

 

The concept of LOVE will be discussed as a desire for, interest in, and acknowledgement of an other, and brought into the realm of architecture with the help of language – for example through concepts related to distance, proximity, accessibility, intimacy, symmetry, asymmetry, contrast, assembly, relation, separation and solitude. Inspired by the students’ subjective experiences and analyses, the task is to develop an architectural project for dwelling that carries the individual students’ chosen argument on LOVE.

To dwell: You and another or others (one, two three, four, five…), with or without pets, companions, children, a garden and neighbours (human and/or nonhuman). To live, to rest, to work, to coexist, to let be, to belong – apart and together.

 

 

The task is to develop a dwelling that facilitates everyday live and work.

Learning outcome

 

Throughout the semester the students will:

 

  • Carry out a research question in dialogue with physical and artistic material(s) and develop an argument towards an architectural project.
  • Reflect on your architectural project in writing.
  • Display deeper knowledge and greater skills in architectural design.
  • Develop a greater awareness of/reflect upon both the measurable and non-measurable qualities of your architectural project.
  • Utilise different media to investigate your research question and combine the material into a holistic project.
  • Position yourself in relation to a contemporary discourse in art, architecture, ecology and philosophy
Working and learning activities

Pedagogy: Artistic research+ Reflection+ Architectural design

Studio Positions provides an arena for students to concentrate and develop their own position in relation to architecture, inspiring them to delve into the social and cultural challenges that mark our time, and reflect on how these challenges have influenced our relationship to architectural space and how we use it.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

Start semester

40 644 ACDL: computational design of an in situ restaurant

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
ACDL: computational design of an in situ restaurant
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 644
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
15
Person in charge
Søren S. Sørensen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Admission to AHO and successful completion of three years bachelor level studies. The studio is open for students of architecture and landscape-architecture. Preliminary skills in computational design is advisory.

Course content

The assignment is to design a restaurant, approx. 600 m2, with outdoor areas and landscaping. Site: Hukodden, Oslo. The studio is project-based and the ACDL studio (advanced computational design laboratory) places a strong emphasis on computational tools as part of the design process and communication of ideas. The studio is not about the tools per se, rather about an experimental approach to architectural design, design processes and methodologies.Our ambition is to investigate fundamental architectural topics by means of analog and computational tools in an iterative way. This focus on process and methodology throughout the semester allows the analogue and digital to be considered together as part of a holistic approach. Therefore, all material produced by the students during the semester will be considered in the final evaluation.

The studio will focus on an iterative design process to test and evaluate performative aspects of designs in relation to changing spatial and functional demands. This is done through a range of computational methods and tools based on the focus of each design project in the studio.

The topics of the studio narrow the focus, while allowing the students to do in-depth investigations simultaneously.  The intention is to help the students to develop their own design methodology while bridging analog processes and digital tools. While architects traditionally rely on intuition and experience to solve design problems, computational design aims to enhance that process. Our aim is to equip the students with the knowledge, skills and tools to achieve their architectural design.

Learning outcome

Knowledge:

  • of the architectural and computational design themes pursued by the studio.
  • of associative modelling.
  • of tools for analysis and simulation relating to building performance.
  • of successful built examples of equivalent projects.
  • of advanced architectural visualization.

Skills:

  • in computational design in architecture.
  • in utilizing associative modelling systems for architectural design.
  • in using simulations, analysis tools and advanced visualization as part of the design process.
  • Reflective thinking and evaluation as a tool for developing design ideas within the design process.

Competence:

  • The ability to develop designs based on specific performative criteria in an integrated manner from the conceptual stage to the material articulation through computational design.
  • The ability to set up and follow through a design process that leads to the desired result.
  • The ability to utilize design as a method of research in architecture that facilitates the conception of novel architectural designs.
Working and learning activities

The studio will be organized in five main phases:

  • 1st Phase: Introduction to computational tools through workshops and short tasks.
  • 2nd Phase: Formulation of the design idea (concept). To be presented in delivery 1 to the teachers.
  • 3rd Phase: Development of the design; Iterative process in which spatial solutions, materials and technical aspects are considered and evaluated. Analysis of the project performance. To be presented in delivery 2 to the teachers and external guest. This delivery is equivalent to the mid-term delivery in a competition process.
  • 4th Phase: Consolidation; Finalizing the design and development of details. To be presented in delivery 3 to the teachers.
  • 5th Phase: There will be a final period for quality check of the project material to be delivered for final exhibition and presented in the final critique to an external sensor.
Curriculum

To be decided.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

Start semester

40 640 In Balance - Arctic Cycles

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
In Balance - Arctic Cycles
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 640
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Tine Hegli
Course content

A design-build exercise for a community greenhouse in Vardø

 

Course content

In Balance studio aims to equip the student with a knowledge platform where architecture is examined within a context of ecological sustainability. 

 

The studio’s main assignment spring 2021 is to design and build a community greenhouse in Vardø, a small coastal town on the Norwegian Arctic mainland. The design strategies applied will emerge from an understanding of natural cyclic systems that form and shape our physical environment. The studio will through three introductory sub-assignments investigate the relation between these systems and the architectural design approach. The learning outcome from the course should be applicable to other design tasks where a minimal climate footprint is part of the ambition.

 

There will be two main tracks in the investigation of cyclic systems; climate cycles and carbon cycles, understood at both a global and local level.

 

Climate cycles: Knowledge on the natural climate cycles and local seasonal weather conditions will inform how the design can give shelter for human activities, and provide conditions for growing of local crops in a challenging Arctic environment. With a global climate in rapid change, the ability to forecast and adapt to future conditions adds further complexity to this task. The course will introduce tools and methods that can catalyze the design process and enable evaluation of different strategies and concepts.

 

Carbon cycles: To reach the UN sustainability goal of climate action and carbon neutrality in 2050, the global society will need to introduce a circular economy and bring the use of resources in balance with what the ecosystems can sustainably supply. This requires an extensive use of reclaimed materials for future architecture, and a design approach that is based on a material archive rather than virgin products. In Vardø a number of buildings are under condemnation due to decades of depopulation, in turn leading to a lack of maintenance. Through the voluntary efforts of local initiators, building elements from these structures are made available as construction materials for the community greenhouse, leapfrogging the barriers of a linear economy still dictating the demolition processes within the building industry today. Seeing the vacant houses in light of their cultural identities, the re-use strategy is given importance also as a way to maintain cultural heritage. This merge of mindsets highlights how future material cycles need to recognize and keep both material and immaterial values in the loop. The course will discuss these aspects of circularity from various angles and through several design exercises with the aim to enable the students to make informed design decisions where quantitative and qualitative data intersect in a lifecycle perspective.  

Pedagogy

The studio pays special attention to the importance of enabling students – the next generation of architects - to actively participate in the professional discourse and thereby contribute to ongoing innovation processes leading towards societies’ existence in balance with nature This is facilitated by bringing in voices that represents a broad spectrum of perspectives, within our own field of work, as well as from neighbouring engineering disciplines, decoding terminology and translating quantifiable measures into design response.

 

The studio teaching, all sub-assignments and the main assignment design phase will take place at AHO. Particular emphasis is placed on the development of a functional project providing fully constructable working drawings, these will be integral to the final evaluation of the studio work. The construction phase will form the closing stage of the semester in week 18 and 19 (3-12.5), after completion of elective courses and hand-ins for pre-diploma, and will be assisted by a solid construction team consisting of local resource persons in Vardø

 

Learning outcome

Knowledge

  • On the impact of human activity in the ecosystems at large, with special focus on the climate footprint of buildings.
  • On the relevance of mapping both physical properties, and cultural identities and values when establishing a material archive from reclaimed sources.
  • On design processes that seek to actively respond to and utilize the local climate (wind, snow, rainfall, solar radiation, daylight).
  • On the importance of bottom-up strategies and community resilience in marginal Arctic communities.

 

Skills

  • To be able to critically engage in the discourse concerning sustainable design, both on a societal level and within a professional environment including the terms and vocabulary that defines zero emission and circular design strategies.
  • To be able to recognise the mechanisms of circularity, identify resource value from alternative perspectives and engender them in a unified concept.
  • To be able to analyze and utilize local climate parameters to design well adapted spaces for both outdoors and indoors activities.

General competence

  • To plan and design a medium-sized building for public use.
  • To develop a sustainable conceptual design based on principals of circular economy.
  • To realize the design through form, materials and details.
  • To develop an individual position to where the students can actively question and debate the ongoing societal changes and architecture can play an important role in the transition.

 

Working and learning activities

 

Course organization and teaching methods

The design studio work will conclude in a realistic architectural proposal, documented with 2D drawings, 3D models – both digital and analogue. The proposal will eventually be constructed 1:1 by the students and teachers in collaboration with local recourses.

 

The core teacher team will consist of Tine Hegli, Kristian Edwards. Additional teaching resources – both internal and external – will be assigned to the sub-assignments and participate in plenary reviews throughout the semester.

 

 

The course will include:

  • Introductory sub-assignments that generate a common knowledge base for the studio
  • Tutoring in the studio (or on digital platforms)
  • Lectures by teachers, invited architects and engineering expertise
  • Site visits to see relevant architecture in the Oslo region
  • Field trip to Vardø (week 18 and 19, 3-12.5)
  • Plenary reviews

 

The course will be bringing in expertise within the following subject areas:

  • Urbanism and landscape – resources from previous and ongoing research work at AHO focusing on societies, resources and landscapes in the artic region. Contribution will focus on place development and community building in marginal communities.
  • Circular design strategies – expertise within the building industry on designing by principals for a circular economy (re-use/re-cycle/up-cycle/design for disassembly/designing out waste etc)
  • Climate analysis – expertise within the building industry with knowledge on the use of climatic simulations (Computational Fluid Dynamics - CFD/Solar radiation/Daylight/outdoor microclimate modelling)
  • Vardø – local stakeholders will be involved in the design development and execution of the final greenhouse design.
Curriculum

The Nordic context and research work on zero carbon buildings provides the background for investigation. The methodology and tools introduced are developed and tested in the profession and about to become mandatory requirements for the building industry going forwards. Course material will be conveyed through lectures, project references and visitation, and in turn linked to project sub-assignments of both theoretical and practical nature.  

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

Start semester

40 639 Architecture of Sport: Downhill

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Architecture of Sport: Downhill
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 639
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Thomas McQuillan
Required prerequisite knowledge

Master Level

Course content

Play is an essential feature of humanity, and sport formalizes this play in a social space. This series of courses is an examination of the spatial and architectural features of sport. Sport is a central aspect of our society, as it has been for millennia. Both the ancient Egyptians and Greeks afforded a prominent place to sport, and throughout history, it has provided a space for both participation and spectatorship. From the most casual of games to the cutthroat world of professional sports, it provides its participants with excitement, confrontation, competition and personal challenge. For the spring 2021 semester, the topic is downhill skiing

The sport of skiing includes many disciplines, from cross-country and telemark to alpine, freestyle and jumping. Each of these occupy their own type of landscape and architecture. And each give rise to a different cultural image and demographic. The research in this course will delve into these topics as a basis for developing original architectural projects in a mountain context. 

Learning outcome

Primary Learning Outcome

  • Ability to employ architectural research as a basis for original designs

Subsidary Learning Outcomes

  • How to do basic research into a topic
  • How landscape, sport and architecture interact
  • How to communicate findings and designs
  • An awareness of mountain architecture
Working and learning activities

The course consists of two activities: a series of lectures by architects, athletes and historians, and weekly reviews of progress. Our studies will lead us from the scale of a landscape (e.g. 1:10.000) to the development of architectural space at 1:50. 

This course is intended as an in-person arrangement, but activities can when needed be moved to the internet. Attendance at all activities is essential. 

Curriculum

An extensive list of literature on the topic is under preparation and will be available at course start. The following are general references on skiing. 

Allen, E.J.B. - The Culture and Sport of Skiing. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, 2007. 

Huntford, R. - Two Planks and a Passion. London: Continuum, 2008.

Johnson, W. - White heat: the extreme skiing life. New York: Atria Books, 2014.

Scharff, R. - Ski magazine's Encyclopedia of skiing. New York : Harper & Row, 1979.

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Presence required Required
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Presence required
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Required
Comment:
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignment-Pass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:-
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Lectures
Evaluation (mid term)
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Lectures
Comment:
Workload activity:Evaluation (mid term)
Comment:

Start semester

40 638 TAP Building in Landscape

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
TAP Building in Landscape
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
40 638
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Beate Hølmebakk
Required prerequisite knowledge

Foundation level in Architecture. 

Course content

T AP is a building design studio concerned with the measurable and immeasurable qualities of architecture. It is a studio where the students are to develop an individual architectural project from abstract concept to concrete solution. It is a studio where spatial, structural, material and tectonic considerations will be based on explicit architectural ambitions and design criteria defined by each student.

 

The brief for the spring 2021 semester will be to design a small to medium sized project in a specific landscape. Some framework for the project will be given to the students as objective constraints concerning site conditions and building function, however the work of the semester will begin with further development of individual design criteria through subjective investigations into landscape qualities and programmatic potential.

 

An important element in the studio will be the question of how the qualities of a site can influence the architectural decisions: The choice of structure and materials, and the design of spatial configurations and qualities.

 

The project will be conceived and developed in two and three dimensions until it reaches completion in a scale relevant to the task.

Working and learning activities

Pedagogy

The main pedagogical tool of the TAP studio is the exchange between given constraints and individual freedom in the design process.

 

Methods

The studio will explore how different representational methods can be used as a tool to promote progression in the design process.

 

Activities

In the beginning of the semester each student is to present her/his portfolio.

The design process will be divided into distinct phases from idea to detailed project. Each phase will be reviewed collectively.

There will be studio tutoring, lectures on architecture from teachers and invited practitioners and reviews with external critics.

An excursion to relevant architectural sites will be part of the studio.

Form of assessment

The students will be evaluated on:

The development and final quality of their projects

Their participation in lectures, reviews and discussions

Their contribution to the studio exhibition

 

There are no grades, the students are assessed to Pass/Fail

 

Workload

T A P will require full time studies and the work load is expected to be substantial.

Curriculum

Literature

A compendium of relevant texts will be made available at the start of the studio. The texts will be the basis for collective talks throughout the semester.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

80 315 Architectural Detailing

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Architectural Detailing
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
80 315
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2021
Maximum number of students: 
12
Person in charge
Ane Sønderaal Tolfsen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Admission to AHO and successful completion of three years bachelor level studies.

Interest for technical drawings, materials, assembly and construction

Course content

The seminar will provide a structure for understanding architectural detailing in terms of technical, structural, and aesthetic considerations in combination with aspects of material, scale, thermal condition, architectural concept and construction logic.

The seminar will primarily give students a framework for why elements are put together as they are – how climatic considerations are solved together with architectural aims and ideas. We will look at historical references to the making of architectural details and its current status in today’s building industry. We will investigate the relationship between the performer and the consumer – the performer meaning creator; the Architect or Engineer, and the consumer as client, builder or contractor. They all read the architectural detail in different ways in terms of - for example - cost, maintenance, fabrication, and even health and safety.

By re-drawing projects not only in detail, but also in plan, section, façade and schemes, students will investigate why and how elements are put together as they are. What does every line in the detail represent? How is heat flow and water controlled in the detail? Which material touch upon each other and which do not? What materials are chosen and why? How is its hierarchy and refinement? How does the detail deal with the buildings life cycle? What does the detail tell us about the ease of assembly? How does the detail even deal with a particular site? 

Architectural detailing is a subject within the field of architecture, where details give us knowledge of interventions and principals for constructing the built environment. Students will through lectures, tasks and discussions be introduced to the complexity of detailing. 

Note: The working and learning activities, assignments and course calendar is subject to change throughout the semester due to the covid-19 pandemic.

 

 

Learning outcome

On completion this course students will have learned:

  • a fundamental understanding of architectural detailing
  • historical reference through the analysis of details
  • the climatic basis of architectural detailing
  • how a detail can develop a project and how details enforce architectural ideas
  • how todays building regulations affect detailing
  • how we detail in various architectural scales (1:5, 1:20 etc) and how detailing work in different size of buildings
Working and learning activities

The seminar will give the students analysis tasks of details from mainly architectural production in Norway. We will search for projects to analyze which is not necessarily architectural icons, but try to find buildings around us which is of higher architectural quality in our surroundings.  We will aim to work with archived drawings, possible site visits and analysis through re-drawing of built projects. In addition to two- and three-dimensional material produced during the seminar, the students will need to conclude their analysis and findings in concise, written texts and descriptions. Supplementing this, there will be other tasks and tutorials during the semester such as readings, written statements and/or other small tasks.

Course meetings with lectures and discussions will be held in the morning, and possible field trips and individual work will take place in the afternoon. The seminar lectures will support and complement the student’s individual tasks. 

Some lectures and discussions during the course will be given in English. Main language is Norwegian due to few international students.

Students are expected to attend all course days and be active participants in the seminar activities.

Note: The working and learning activities, assignments and course calendar is subject to change throughout the semester due to the covid-19 pandemic.

Curriculum

The curriculum will be given out closer to semester start.

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Annet - spesifiser i kommentarfeltet RequiredStudents are expected to attend all course meetings and be active contributors and participants. The seminar requires full days of attendance all Tuesdays and a full week of attendance during elective week. In addition, the students need to work on seminar tasks on their own time.
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Annet - spesifiser i kommentarfeltet
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Required
Comment:Students are expected to attend all course meetings and be active contributors and participants. The seminar requires full days of attendance all Tuesdays and a full week of attendance during elective week. In addition, the students need to work on seminar tasks on their own time.
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:

80 121 Introduction to Architecture

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK2 Introduksjon til arkitektur
Credits: 
18
Course code: 
80 121
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2021
Person in charge
Lone Sjøli
Jonas Gunerius Larsen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Gjennomført GK1, dvs. fått godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering. 

Course content

GK2 er en fortsettelse av GK1. Semesteret består av flere prosjekteringsoppgaver med innleveringer gjennom semesteret. I dette semesteret introduseres studentene for et sammensatt program som skal utvikles gjennom plan, snitt og modell. Grunnleggende problemstillinger knyttet til tomt, kontekst, konstruksjon, materialer introduseres som del av oppgavene. Undervisning i analog tegning og digital tegning løper parallelt med studioundervisningen gjennom semesteret.

Undervisningen i første studieår markerer starten på et sammenhengende forløp, og de kunnskaper og ferdigheter studenten tilegner seg, bygges det videre på gjennom de tre årene i grunnutdanningen. Det er karakteristisk for utøvelse av arkitekturfaget at alle de kompetansene man tilegner seg virker sammen som en helhet, og manifesteres gjennom prosjektarbeid.

Learning outcome

KUNNSKAP:

Studenten skal få kunnskap

  • om konseptuell idéutvikling ved selv å gjennomføre flere konseptuelle prosesser
  • om forholdet mellom rom, konstruksjoner og materialer gjennom utvikling av egne prosjekter der dette testes ut
  • om prosjekteringsprosessens arbeidsmetoder ved å løse oppgaver der ulike definerte arbeidsmetoder anvendes 
  • om arkitekturfagets kommunikasjonsformer ved å presentere og diskutere eget arbeid både visuelt, tekstlig og muntlig
  • om arkitekturfagets ulike tradisjoner, gjennom en første introduksjon til arkitektur fra historien og samtiden formidlet gjennom forelesninger og befaringer

FERDIGHETER:

  • Studenten skal kunne utvikle et enkelt arkitekturprosjekt ved å anvende arkitekturfagets grunnleggende arbeidsmetoder; tegning, modell og verbal kommunikasjon.
  • Studenten skal bli kjent med egen arbeidsprosess, og å kunne presentere prosessen som en del av et resultat. 
  • Studenten skal utvikle evnen til å diskutere og reflektere skriftlig og muntlig rundt faglig innhold i eget og andres arbeid.
  • Studenten skal kunne bygge modeller i flere skalaer og materialer
  • Studenten skal beherske AHOs verksted.
  • Studenten skal beherske de arkitektoniske tegnekonvensjonene, derunder plan, snitt, oppriss, og ulike former for perspektiv hvor parallellperspektiv inngår.
  • Studenten skal kunne benytte profesjonsrettede og kunstfaglige tilnærminger i analog tegning.
  • Studenten skal beherske digitale tegneprogrammer 

GENERELL KOMPETANSE:

  • Studenten skal kunne utvikle, visualisere og presentere et selvstendig arkitektonisk prosjekt i henhold til de gitte oppgavene.
  • Studenten skal kunne diskutere og reflektere omkring arkitektur med utgangspunkt i eget og andres arbeid.
  • Studenten skal påbegynne arbeidet som løper gjennom hele studiet med å utvikle et personlig visuelt uttrykk.
  • Studenten skal utvikle evnen til faglig samarbeid gjennom gruppeoppgaver og deltakelse i felles faglige diskusjoner.
Working and learning activities

Studentene arbeider i to studioer, men undervisning og oppgavestilling er felles. Det er lagt opp til individuelt arbeid så vel som gruppearbeid. Undervisningen foregår i form av ukentlig veiledning, gjennomgang av prosjektarbeidet, forelesninger, seminarer og befaringer. Kontakten mellom lærere og studenter foregår på tomannshånd, i grupper eller i plenum. Felles gjennomganger der studentene legger eget arbeid frem for diskusjon utgjør en viktig del av undervisningen. Det forventes tilstedeværelse og aktivt engasjement i veiledning, gjennomganger og faglige arrangementer. Kurset benytter den digitale læringsplattformen Moodle til intern kommunikasjon av semesterets innhold og planer.

COVID-19: Det må påberegnes at noe undervisning og veiledning legges digitalt i tråd med gjeldende Covid-restriksjoner. Digitalt oppmøte er forventet på lik linje med fysisk tilstedeværelse.

Curriculum

Anbefalt litteratur: 

Anne Beim - Tektoniske visioner i arkitektur

Francis D. K. Ching - Architecture: Form, Space, and Order

Andrea Deplazes - Constructing Architecture: Materials, Processes, Structures

Christian Norberg-Schulz  – Mellom jord og himmel

Steen Eiler Rasmussen - Om at oppleve arkitektur

Francis D.K Ching: Architectural Graphics

Ansgar und Benedikt Schulz: Perfect Scale

Adrian Forty: Words and Buildings: A Vocabulary of Modern Architecture

The Power of Circumstance: Architecture and creative Independence. Six Lectures by Per Olaf Fjeld

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / fail
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Attendance
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:

80 123 Architectural History 1

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK2 Arkitekturhistorie 1
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
80 123
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2021 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2021 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2021
Required prerequisite knowledge

Gjennomført GK1, dvs. fått godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering. 

Course content

Kurset gir en innføring i vestens arkitektur- og kunsthistorie fra førhistorisk tid fram til ca. 1850. Forelesninger og pensum er konsentrert om en serie utvalgte monumenter og har til hensikt å plassere disse innenfor en bred fortolkningspraksis som favner billedkunst, litteratur, arkeologi såvel som bygningenes forskningshistorie generelt.

Learning outcome

Det forventes at studentene erverver oversikt over hovedverker, tendenser og perioder i arkitektur- og kunsthistorien. Han eller hun skal kunne gjenkjenne verk fra ulike perioder og analysere bygninger med hensyn til bruk, konstruksjon, materialer og historisk kontekst. I tillegg forventes det at studenetene kan innta en konstruktiv, kritistsk holdning til historiefaget og til dets modeller og periodiseringer.

Working and learning activities

Kurset er basert på forelesninger som følger historien kronologisk og på obligatrisk pensum, som presenteres ved semesterstart. Studentene forventes å delta aktivt i studentpresentasjoner, uhøytidelige gjennomganger og på ekskursjonen som finner sted mot slutten av semesteret.

Det må påberegnes at noe undervisning og veiledning legges digitalt i tråd med gjeldende Covid-restriksjoner. Digitalt oppmøte er forventet på lik linje med fysisk tilstedeværelse.

Curriculum

OBLIGATORISK LITTERATUR 

Flere titler vil kunne føyes til listen i løpet av semesteret. NB. Merk også at pensum inkluderer forelesninger.

Oversikt
Richard Ingersoll og Spiro Kostof, World Architecture: A cross-Culturual History (Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, 2013), kap. 2.1-2; 4.2; 5.1; 6.1-2; 7.1; 8.3; 9.2; 10.1; 11.3; 12.2; kap. 13,14,15

Verdens Syv Underverk
The Seven Wonders of the Ancient World, Peter A. Clayton og Martin J. Price, red. (London-New York: Routledge, 1988, eller senere utgaver), ss. 1–12. 

Salomos tempel
Alan Balfour, Solomon’s Temple: Myth, Conflict, and Faith (Malden. Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell, 2012), ss. 21–64.

Parthenon
Ian Jenkins, Greek Architecture and its Sculpture (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2006), kap. 4. 

Pantheon
Mark Wilson Jones, “Building on Adversity: The Pantheon and Problems With Its Construction,” i Tod A. Marder og Mark Wilson Jones, red., Pantheon from Antiquity to the Present (London: Cambridge University Press, 2015), kap. 7. 

Katedralen i Chartres
Philip Ball, Universe of Stone: Chartres Cathedral and the Triumph of the Medieval Mind (London: Bodley head, 2008), kap. 3 & 8. 

Villa Rotonda
James S. Ackermann, The Villa: Form and Ideology of Country Houses (London: Thames & Hudson, 1990), kap. 4.
  
Versailles
Guy Walton, Louis XIV’s Versailles (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986),kap. 5 & 6.

 

VIDERE LESNING

Mari Hvattum, “En reise i fremmed land. Verneteoretiske posisjoner i samtidsarkitekturen,” i Peter Butenschøn, red. Tid i arkitektur: om å bygge i fire dimensjoner (Oslo: Akademisk Publisering, 2009).

Victor Plahte Tschudi, “Heavenly Jerusalem in Baroque Architectural Theory,” i Bianca Kühnel, Galit Noga-Banai, og Hanna Vorholt, red., Visual Constructs of Jerusalem (Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2014,), ss. 179–85. 

Alexander Nagel and Christopher S. Wood, Anachronic Renaissance (New York: Zone Books, 2010), kap. 14 og 15.

Eyal Weizman, Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation (London-New York, Verso, 2007), kap. 1.  

Richard Etlin “The Pantheon in the Modern Age” i Tod A. Marder og Mark Wilson Jones, red., Pantheon from antiquity to the present (London: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 380–422 (kap. 13) 

Erwin Panofsky, Gothic Architecture and Scholasticism (Cleveland: The World Architecture, 1957, eller senere utg.).

Rudolf Wittkower, Architectural Principles in the Age of Humanism (hvilken som helst utg.).

Alina Payne, “Rudolf Wittkower and Architectural Principles in the Age of Modernism,” The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, vol. 53, Nr. 3 (Sep., 1994), ss. 322–342.

Robin Evans, “Figures, Doors and Passages” i Robin Evans, Translations from Drawing to Building and Other Essays (London: Architectural Association, 1997), ss. 55–91.  

Jörg Martin Merz, Pietro da Cortona and Roman Baroque Architecture (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 2008).  

Victor Plahte Tschudi, Baroque Antiquity: Archaeological Imagination in Early Modern Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2017), kap. 3.

Peter Berlyn, “The Crystal Palace: Its Architectural History and Constructive Marvels”, (London, James Gilbert, 1851), ss. 33–40. 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Home ExaminationIndividualA-F
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Home Examination
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:A-F
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Attendance
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:

Pages