fbpx 2024 Vår | Page 6 | The Oslo School of Architecture and Design

Languages

2024 Vår

70 401 Interactive Spaces and Environments

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Interactive Spaces and Environments
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 401
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2024
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Enrique Encinas
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level coures (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS. Open to all programmes at AHO.

Course content

The course looks at an expanding overlap between interaction design, architecture and media arts, to explore how the ideas and methods of interaction design can be applied in larger environments and spaces. The course investigates emerging trends in responsive spaces and installations, environments and interactive architecture, focusing on larger scale experiences, using physical spaces as the arena for interaction. These investigations will look beyond the direct point and click‐style interactions to less direct forms.

Interactive Spaces and Environments is aimed at both design and architecture students, working in cross‐disciplinary collaboration, and aims to foster thinking and designing beyond the material object, towards the experimental and performative.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

The students will

  • get an overview of a broad range of existing work and theories in the fields of sensate space, interactive architecture, immersive environments and digital installation art.
  • gain a grounding in basic sensor and interactive technologies and how they can be used to create reactive and interactive experiences.
  • build a theoretical and practical framework for how people will experience such intervention.

SKILLS

The students will

  • be able to use tools and methods for prototyping interaction concepts and problems.

GENERAL COMPETANCE

The students will 

  • be able to utilize knowledge and skills (as defined above) in an independent manner in different situations and collaborations, within and across disciplines.
Working and learning activities

Different workshops and projects to be arranged according to activity plan.During the final project and exam week, it is expected that the students are participating in a bigger group work building an experimental and interactive room/environment. The project needs to be documented with a short, written report. Several smaller modules will be carried out during the course, some individual and some in groups. One of the moduls shall result in a written text. All deliveries throughout the course will be evaluated accordingly.

Curriculum

Recommended reading:

Grau, O. (2003). Virtual art: from illusion to immersion. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Fox, Michael & Kemp, Miles (2009) Interactive Architecture. Princeton Architectural Press.

Ihde, Don (2010) Embodied Technics. Automatic Press / VIP.

Novak, Marcos (1991) ‘Liquid Architectures in Cyberspace’, Cyberspace: First Steps. (PDF)

Shepard, Mark (2011) Sentient City. MIT press.

Schwartzman, Madeline (2011) See Yourself Sensing – redfining human perception.  Black Dog Publishing, London/UK.

Bullivant, L. (2005).4dspace: interactive architecture. London: Wiley‐Academy.

Bullivant, L. (2007) 4dsocial: interactive design environments. London: Wiley.

Noel, S., Rucki, E., & Freyer, C. (2008) Digital by design: crafting technology for products and environments. London: Thames & Hudson.

Fox, M. and Kemp, M. (2009) Interactive Architecture. Princeton University Press

Roosegaarde, D. (2010) Interactive Landscapes. Amsterdam.

NAi Bullivant, L. (2006) Responsive Environments: Architecture, art and design. London: V&A Contemporary.

Uexküll, J. v. (1936). Niegeschaute Welten: die Umwelten meiner Freunde : ein Erinnerungsbuch. Berlin: Fischer.

 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failEach student is expected to conduct research on interactive spaces and environments in relation to their own field of interest. Evaluation will be based on the following elements in percentage: 80% Design projects, presentations, online deliverables, workshops and appropriate presentation material for the end of term AHO‐works exhibition. 20% End report. Projects will be assessed for their creativity, expression, innovation, usability and appropriateness of design.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Each student is expected to conduct research on interactive spaces and environments in relation to their own field of interest. Evaluation will be based on the following elements in percentage: 80% Design projects, presentations, online deliverables, workshops and appropriate presentation material for the end of term AHO‐works exhibition. 20% End report. Projects will be assessed for their creativity, expression, innovation, usability and appropriateness of design.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThe semester has an expected 80% general attendance and a 90% attendance at lectures and workshops.
Group work
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:The semester has an expected 80% general attendance and a 90% attendance at lectures and workshops.
Workload activity:Group work
Comment:

70 405 Public Sector as Material for Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Public Sector as Material for Design
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 405
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2024
Maximum number of students: 
20
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level (BA-level) courses at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS.

The course is open only for design students. Due to the specific context of the course working knowledge of Norwegian is required.

Course content

This course will investigate the complex structures, systems, experiences, connections and culture of the public service sector in Norway. The primary framing of the course is to consider the public sector as material for design and how investigating this material through visualization and mapping can give access and an understanding of this complex context.

Through the course students will be introduced to leading voices from design, public service management as well as others engaged in questions of public service innovation from several levels of government.

The course is positioned from an interdisciplinary perspective that represents systems orientated design and service design.

The main activity of the course will be to investigate, unpack, reflect, visualize and disseminate the material that is public service sector Norway and make this accessible to other designers and bureaucrats working in this context. The output and value of the activity is not only in the finalized visualizations but in the co-created and co-learning space created between students and the many actors with which they will engage.

Learning outcome

Students will gain an understanding of how the public sector in Norway is constructed; from governmental, to directorate to municipal level. You will also learn about how the Norwegian public services are organized, interconnected, managed and delivered. From a material perspective they will gain an understanding of tensions, flexibilities and qualities within the structure, system and relationships up and through the entire system. You will also learn techniques of dissemination and visualization that will make this material accessible to others whilst honing skills of facilitation and collaboration with others from outside of design.

Specifically you will gain:

  • An overview of how designers can work together with the public sector in Norway
  • An in-depth understanding of the system
  • A sense of the materiality of the system
  • Guidance on how we might unpack and communicate the public sector in Norway
  • Skills of critical reflection
  • Insight on how the use of visualization and mapping might be used as a strategic tool for engagement and reflection

 

 

Working and learning activities

The first few weeks of the course will start with direction from course leaders to help gain an overview of public sector Norway as a whole whilst, through practice, learning visualization skills necessary to engage and disseminate this knowledge.

After the introduction phase students will plan and run workshop activity together with leading experts engaged in public sector management and innovation, representing several disciplinary perspectives to draw out detailed material knowledge about service system.

Finally, students will further investigate, detail and refine their insights into visualizations for dissemination, exhibition and as a vehicle for further discussion.

 

 

 

Curriculum

We will upload links and documents to Moodle. Here are some things to get you going.

  1. Radical Help – Hillary Cottam
  1.  New Synthesis of Public Administration: Serving in the 21st Century – J. Bourgon
  1. https://openpolicy.blog.gov.uk/2020/03/06/introducing-a-government-as-a-system-toolkit/
  1. http://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/
  1. Lewis, J. M., McGann, M., & Blomkamp, E. (2020). When design meets power: Design thinking, public sector innovation and the politics of policymaking. Policy & Politics48(1), 111-130.
  1. Junginger, S. (2013). Design and innovation in the public sector: Matters of design in policy-making and policy implementation. Annual Review of Policy Design1(1), 1-11.
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failYou will deliver the following as part of the course and will be evaluated based upon this: -Individual visualizations of aspects of the area of study -Reflections on the material aspects of public sector Norway -A broader visual narrative that brings together insights from all students that disseminates findings You will be evaluated on the deliverables listed above and your contribution to discussions throughout the course. You should show your understanding of design and public service in your work. Your final piece of work shall be communicated so it highlights the unique characteristics, challenges and potentials of the public sector as material for design.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:You will deliver the following as part of the course and will be evaluated based upon this: -Individual visualizations of aspects of the area of study -Reflections on the material aspects of public sector Norway -A broader visual narrative that brings together insights from all students that disseminates findings You will be evaluated on the deliverables listed above and your contribution to discussions throughout the course. You should show your understanding of design and public service in your work. Your final piece of work shall be communicated so it highlights the unique characteristics, challenges and potentials of the public sector as material for design.
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThe students are expected to take active part and be present in the studio, attend lectures and groupwork throughout the whole course. They are expected to attend all presentations, workshops and formal counsellings.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:The students are expected to take active part and be present in the studio, attend lectures and groupwork throughout the whole course. They are expected to attend all presentations, workshops and formal counsellings.

Start semester

70 407 Ideation and Drawing Techniques in Product Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Ideation and Drawing Techniques in Product Design
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 407
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2024
Maximum number of students: 
20
Person in charge
Stein Rokseth
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level coures (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent, 180 ECTS. The course is open for all programmes at AHO.

Course content

The course focuses on ideation and drawing techniques through a design process, comprising ideation, conceptualization through drawing techniques, mock-up techniques, visualization through product sketches, oral and visual client presentation.

Learning outcome

Knowledge: Experience from a design process with emphasis on ideation, visualization through product sketching, mock-up model making, digital rendering, oral and visual client presentation.

Skills: Basic skills in design process comprising; ideation, conceptualization through drawing techniques, mock-up techniques, digital rendering, aesthetic assessment, visualization, oral presentation, and final exhibition design. Oral and visual client presentation.

General competence: Design methods, three-dimensional form and aesthetics.

Working and learning activities

The course is organized around lectures, discussion groups, individual tutoring, individual work and delivery.

 

Curriculum

Link to reading list in Leganto.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failThe following elements will count in the assesment: Process, final deliveries as specified, oral and visual presentation, and final exhibition. Required delivery: For exhibition: - 2 posters (A + B) in A2 format (portrait format) containing: - Descriptive concept name - Sketches that describe the concept idea and new functionality - Visualization through one digital product rendering - 1 physical mock-up model that conveys the new functionality - Oral presentation with arguments for the product concept Delivery of final course documentation on Moodle: - 1 photo of your exhibition stand - 1 photo of poster A - 1 photo of poster B - 1 image of mock-up model(s)
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:The following elements will count in the assesment: Process, final deliveries as specified, oral and visual presentation, and final exhibition. Required delivery: For exhibition: - 2 posters (A + B) in A2 format (portrait format) containing: - Descriptive concept name - Sketches that describe the concept idea and new functionality - Visualization through one digital product rendering - 1 physical mock-up model that conveys the new functionality - Oral presentation with arguments for the product concept Delivery of final course documentation on Moodle: - 1 photo of your exhibition stand - 1 photo of poster A - 1 photo of poster B - 1 image of mock-up model(s)

70 602 Service Design 2: Service Design Futures

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Service Design 2: Service Design Futures
Credits: 
24
Course code: 
70 602
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
English
Year: 
2024
Maximum number of students: 
24
Person in charge
Josina Vink
Required prerequisite knowledge

Passed foundation level (BA-level) at AHO or equivalent education with 180 ECTS.

Students who have taken Service Design 1 will be preferred, but this is not a requirement for this course.

International 2 year master students must have been approved for service design.

Recommended previous knowledge.

  • Service Design concepts and methodologies
  • User centred design methodologies
  • Qualitative data analysis
  • Ideation techniques
  • Prototyping
  • Concept communication
Course content

This course, delivered in 2 blocks, focuses on honing existing Service Design knowledge and competencies through practice by direct access to AHO’s focus areas of research, whilst actively contributing to their development.

In addition, undertaking this form of learning through contributing to research, the students will develop their ability to reflect on their own design practice within the rigorous framework of research practice.

This semester will have a specific focus on research being delivered and development at AHO that focuses predominantly on Public Services. The Norwegian public sector has been quick to embrace the potential of Service Design to drive positive change and innovate within public service provision and AHO has long been a contributor in this change since including service design as a disciplinary field in 2004.

By working within this research context students will practice what they have learnt in Service Design I and/or GK5 and GK6 by applying these design skills through ‘research-through-design’ and participatory action research to ongoing research projects with in-house researchers and practitioners together with external partners. They will also develop their knowledge and gain experience of working in public sector services.

Students will also be introduced to concepts and frameworks on differing approaches to design towards reflection on their own praxis, whilst connecting this to design as an approach to knowledge production.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

  • Understand and appropriate research methodologies used within design research projects.
  • Gain insight into the different framings and perspectives on approaches to design whilst reflecting on own burgeoning practice.
  • Develop an analytical approach and critical perspective on the field of Service Design
  • Reflection on what design research and its methodologies mean for service design practice and vice versa

SKILLS

  • Ability to read, understand and contribute to design research
  • Ability to analyze a service design problem in relation to relevant research theories and models
  • The ability to reflect upon the potential of service design within the context of public services.
  • Skills of diplomacy
  • Working ethically and thoughtfully with marginalized populations

GENERAL COMPETENCE 

  • Gain an overview of the state of the art of Service Design research
  • Promote an active and designerly participation within research projects
  • Learn to engage and collaborate with external partners
  • Promote critical reflection on the unintended consequences of service design decisions

 

Working and learning activities

The course is run differently from Service Design 1. In Service Design 2 students will be working more independently and in close collaboration with service design researchers and practitioners at the school.

The main learning activities will be based upon research projects in collaboration with external partners, where the students will be part of the research team. The course also integrates studio work (group and individual), tutoring and reflective sessions in the classroom, workshops, structured presentations, and discussions with the course participants.

There will also be lectures with invited guests, designers and researchers. These will include sessions specifically designed to give students insight into differing ways to approach designing both in practice and research, whilst space to reflect on their own burgeoning practice. The students are expected to read some curriculum literature. 

Evaluation

 

 

 

Curriculum

Candy, S., & Kornet, K. (2019). Turning foresight inside out: An introduction to ethnographic experiential futures. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3), 3-22.

Neeley, J.P. (2021). Consider everything: Aligning service design practice with our complex reality. Touchpoint: The Service Design Journal. Special Issue: Service Design and Systems Thinking.

Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT press.

Hirsch, T. (2020, April). Practicing without a license: Design research as psychotherapy. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-11).

Vink, J., Koskela-Huotari, K., Tronvoll, B., Edvardsson, B., & Wetter-Edman, K. (2021). Service ecosystem design: Propositions, process model, and future research agenda. Journal of Service Research, 24(2), 168-186.

Vink, J., & Koskela-Huotari, K. (2021). Social structures as service design materials. International Journal of Design, 15(3), 29-43.

Duan, Z. (2022). Professional Design in between Plural Makings. In  Satu Miettinen, Mikkonen Enni, Maria Cecilia Loschiavo dos Santos, and Sarantou Melanie (Eds), Artistic Cartography and Design Explorations to Pluriverse. Taylor and Francis.

Further readings to be confirmed.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)IndividualPass / failBeing a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through both projects will be possibly presented by means of: • Group and individual mid-term deliverables • Workshops & interviews • Evidencing material In each module students will have group and individual deliverables that will receive qualitative assessment to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The course will involve the participation in service design projects and the research connected to these. At the beginning of each module, the structure, contents and examination form will be detailed. Each project will have a final presentation and report or equivalent deliverable that will be assessed in pass/fail by an external sensor and the course leader. The details for each project regarding particular deliverables and the evaluation criteria will be described in the brief for each project at the beginning of the module. The students need to pass all modules to pass the course. The pass/fail will be evaluated individually although there will be group assignments. For students who fail the first module, a supplementary delivery can be submitted before the final assessment
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Portfolio assessment (Vurderingsmappe)
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:Being a practice-driven course, the student’s progression through both projects will be possibly presented by means of: • Group and individual mid-term deliverables • Workshops & interviews • Evidencing material In each module students will have group and individual deliverables that will receive qualitative assessment to identify their strengths and weaknesses. The course will involve the participation in service design projects and the research connected to these. At the beginning of each module, the structure, contents and examination form will be detailed. Each project will have a final presentation and report or equivalent deliverable that will be assessed in pass/fail by an external sensor and the course leader. The details for each project regarding particular deliverables and the evaluation criteria will be described in the brief for each project at the beginning of the module. The students need to pass all modules to pass the course. The pass/fail will be evaluated individually although there will be group assignments. For students who fail the first module, a supplementary delivery can be submitted before the final assessment
Workload activityComment
AttendanceThis is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Students are required to attend at least 80% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project to pass the course. The course leader will take assistance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session and will inform the students when they are close to failing the course due to attendance. The students are also expected to keep count on their absences.
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:This is an intensive course and it demands consistent and hard work from the participants. Students are required to attend at least 80% of the main course events described in the detailed calendar for each project to pass the course. The course leader will take assistance 15 minutes after the beginning of each session and will inform the students when they are close to failing the course due to attendance. The students are also expected to keep count on their absences.

12 802 Diploma Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Diplom design
Credits: 
30
Course code: 
12 802
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2024
Required prerequisite knowledge

Completed pre-diploma and 270 ECTS in total.

Course content

The diploma at the Institute of Design is the final project in the Master programme. The Institute takes a broad approach to the design profession that includes products, services, systems and interactive experiences. The education brings together aesthetics and technology, creativity and design methods, culture and research. The programme has roots in Industrial Design, but today also includes Interaction Design, Service Design and Systems Oriented Design. This is reflected in the width of our students’ diplomas, and the broad range of themes that they address.

The diploma concludes our five-year Master in design and is done in the final semester. The diploma is a self-initiated and self-organised project that takes place over 18 weeks. The students develop and define their own project-descriptions (the diploma programme) in a pre-diploma’ course, in the semester leading up to the diploma. During the diploma project the students have a main supervisor at the Institute, but can also seek additional input and guidance form across AHO and externally. Diplomas are typically done as individual projects, but can also be done in groups.

The diplomas at the Institute of Design are characterised by variety and breadth. The diploma projects are typically initiated and developed by the students, and they are free to explore different themes and formats. These can be creative explorations, product development and theoretical projects, or collaborations with commercial companies, public services or researchprojects. Diplomas can also be discursive design projects that seek to raise questions or challenge societal or cultural issues. Often our diplomas are ‘hybrids’ that bring together different methods and actors, or span across our different design specialisations.

The purpose of the diploma is multi-layered. The students have to bring together what they have learned throughout their education to define and develop their own project. A challenge here is how the project is followed through, how it is developed and how it is executed as a design project. In the scope of the Master, the diploma is a relatively large project that demands that the student is self-driven, organised, structured and creative. At the same time, the diploma is a possibility for the student to explore his or her own identity as a designer, to research topics she or he finds interesting, or to challenge the students acquired skills and methods. The diplomas should therefore be understood holistically as projects where the students get to choose their own themes, approaches and processes, but where the challenge is also about organising and developing the project itself. Defining and developing the scope and plan for the project is done both in the project-description (diploma programme), as well as throughout the process.

It is important to note that in doing a holistic evaluation of the diplomas, the focus should be on the project itself rather than how closely it follows the initial description or diplomaprogramme.

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

By completing a diploma the students base of knowledge will be about:

-design methods, materials, technologies and tools

-design history in related field

-research methods, design processes

-use of users and targets groups in projects

SKILLS

-be able to develop design solutions through artistic and scientific research, concept visualization, co-working and finalizing a project.

-master design-driven methods, tools and ways of expression, and be able to use this in a creative process, in a goal-oriented, professional and experimenting way.

-be able to reflect on the relationship between content and the project and the wider world.

-be able to communicate both process and end result in a good way.

GENERAL COMPETENCE

-be able to communicate values and concepts and inspire dialog and interdisciplinary processes through a wide range of design methods and tools.

-be able to perform a set of professional roles and cooperate well with other occupational groups.

-be able to reflect on own performance and deliveries and stretch beyond own limits.

-take responsibility for own learning and academic progression, be able to transfer knowledge into other fields.

- be considerate on own contribution and ethical questions at hand.

 

Evaluation

The students deliver their diplomas in the form of their collected outputs, a presentation and a report. The outputs can be a variety of formats; models, prototypes, installations, diagrams, visualisations, mappings etc. The diploma report should give an overview of the project, the process, the possible outcomes (impacts) and the student’s reflections. The report should not be evaluated on its own, but as giving an overview of the project. The students also deliver a 20-minute public presentation of their diploma on the day of the evaluation. The sensors shall evaluate the compete diploma project delivery consisting of the students collected outputs, their report and public presentation.

Evaluation process
The evaluation of the diplomas are done by an external team of sensors. This sensor-team represents the different design-directions that the students can specialise towards. All the sensors are responsible for the overall evaluation of all diplomas, but each sensor is given particular responsibility for a selection of diplomas. The sensor team is first given the diploma reports digitally. These report should give an overview of the diplomas. The reports should be read by the sensors in preparation for the evaluation at AHO. The physical outcomes of the projects is presented to the sensors at AHO. On the day of the diploma-presentations each student is given 20 minutes to present their diploma. The sensor-team then have a total of 15 minutes for questions, discussion and feedback. These 15 minutes should also include a brief summary of the sensors evaluation and overall feedback. This is a public event for the whole of the school and the intentions for this presentation-format is to facilitate dynamic discussions about the diplomas and interesting responses, as well as a learning situation for other students The sensor-team’s final evaluation is given as a written report for each project. This is delivered some time after the public presentation day.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / failIn evaluating a diploma, the aim is to consider how the diploma has been developed as a project; including both its thematics, its processes, its outcomes and its reflections. The diplomas should be evaluated on the terms, problematics and scope that the students themselves have defined in their project. The delivery consists of: Diploma report, models - if that is part of the project, exhibition, public presentation.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:In evaluating a diploma, the aim is to consider how the diploma has been developed as a project; including both its thematics, its processes, its outcomes and its reflections. The diplomas should be evaluated on the terms, problematics and scope that the students themselves have defined in their project. The delivery consists of: Diploma report, models - if that is part of the project, exhibition, public presentation.

70 700 Pre-diploma Design

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
Pre-Diplom Design
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
70 700
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian / English
Year: 
2024
Required prerequisite knowledge

Completed 240 ECTS (5 year degree) or 90 ECTS (2 year degree)  in total.

Course content

The PreDip course aims to help students to develop a solid launch pad for their diploma projects, one that will allow them to start their design/research process from a knowledgeable and critical position and with a clear plan.

The choice of theme is primarily in the hands of each student, and the direction in which this subject is to take is mainly the result of consultations between each student and their supervisor, the institute leader, and the course staff.

The course is organized in two main phases. The first phase focus both on the individual student’s own skills and interests and the choice of the actual theme of the project. This first phase will be presented and assessed at a midterm-presentation (after app. 1 month). The second phase deals with designing the actual project with a feasible project proposal as its main and final delivery.

 

Learning outcome

KNOWLEDGE

- A reflective, constructive and critical stance to his or her own disciplinary interests, strengths and weaknesses.

SKILLS
- An ability to pitch concepts for as well peers as for potential tutors and partners.

- An ability to develop a feasible diploma project as required at the Institute of Design at AHO.

- An ability to plan an independent or colloborative project.

 

GENERAL COMPETANCE
- An ability to convey his or her maturity as a designer at a level that make a positive outcome for a diploma project at AHO very likely.

- An ability to conceptualize design ideas into an actionable project proposal.

- An ability to propose, discuss and plan an independent study and design project.

Working and learning activities

The course will mix lectures, own research and writing with presentations and tutoring.

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
ReportIndividualPass / fail The student is responsible for taking required initiatives to make agreement with both main and secondary tutor. Furthermore, the student should submit the required deliverables and present the given assignments in plenary presentations according to the timetable of the course. The final submission consists of a final written project description and a final plenary presentation, which both are compulsory. Passed course requires approved written project description and oral presentation.
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Report
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment: The student is responsible for taking required initiatives to make agreement with both main and secondary tutor. Furthermore, the student should submit the required deliverables and present the given assignments in plenary presentations according to the timetable of the course. The final submission consists of a final written project description and a final plenary presentation, which both are compulsory. Passed course requires approved written project description and oral presentation.

80 162 History of Architectural Theories

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK6 Arkitektureorienes historie
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
80 162
Level of study: 
Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2024
Person in charge
Mari Hvattum
Required prerequisite knowledge

Bestått alle emner i GK1 og GK2. Bestått studiodelen av GK3 og GK4. Gjennomført (dvs. fått  godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering) i øvrige emner i GK3, GK4 og hele GK5.

Course content

Kurset er en introduksjon til arkitekturteori og arkitekturtenkning gjennom historien. Ulike tanketradisjoner og perioder belyses ved hjelp av originaltekster, forelesninger og diskusjon. Kurset er organisert som en forelesnings- og seminarserie. Forelesningene finner sted en gang i uken, etterfulgt av obligatoriske leseseminarer. Seminarene foregår i flere parallelle grupper og er ledet av seminarlærere. Kurset begynner med samtidsteorien og går gradvis bakover i tid. Innimellom legger vi inn skriveseminarer og skriveøvelser.

Learning outcome

Studentene skal få kjennskap til og forståelse av grunnleggende teoridannelser i arkitekturen gjennom historien. Målet er å oppøve studentenes teoretiske engasjement samt gi trening i akademisk skriving og argumentasjon.

Working and learning activities

Forelesninger, leseseminarer og essayskriving.

Curriculum

Pensumlitteratur legges ut på Moodle.

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Presence required Not required
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Presence required
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Not required
Comment:
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualA-F
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:A-F
Comment:

60 161

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK6 Arkitekturproduksjon
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
60 161
Level of study: 
Bachelor / Master
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2024
Person in charge
Halvor Weider Ellefsen
Required prerequisite knowledge

Bestått alle emner i GK1 og GK2. Bestått studiodelen av GK3 og GK4. Gjennomført (dvs. fått godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering) i øvrige emner i GK3, GK4 og hele GK5.

Course content

Arkitekturproduksjon er et teorifag som gir innblikk i hvordan politiske, økonomiske, juridiske og tekniske parametere påvirker utviklingen av et byggeprosjekt, fra unnfangelsen av en idé, gjennom tidligfase, til prosjektering og ferdigstilling. Målet med kurset er å vise hvordan ulike rammeforutsetninger og byggeprosesser preger produksjonen av arkitektur, men også hvordan de virker sammen med arkitektfagets praksisformer, og anvendes i utvikling av arkitektur. Kurset er bygget opp som en case-basert forelesningsrekke der hvert foredrag tar utgangspunkt i ett eller flere realiserte bygningsprosjekter som ramme for å diskutere en spesifikk problemstilling. 

Learning outcome

Kunnskaper: Kurset tar sikte på å øke studentenes kunnskap om hvordan reguleringer, rammeforutsetninger, byggesystemer og produksjonsmetoder kan forstås, fortolkes og anvendes i arkitekturproduksjonen.

Ferdigheter: Styrke studentenes forståelse av arkitektfaget som mangefasettert praksisform, og deres operative kompetanse, med vekt på hvordan konkrete problemstillinger løses i praktisk prosjektutvikling. 

Generell kompetanse: Kurset gir studentene verktøy for å kunne diskutere og analysere arkitektur som verk i kontekst av byggets fysiske, tekniske og politisk-økonomiske kontekst, hvor byggesystemer og produksjonsmetoder kan og bør betraktes som en integrert del av fagpraksis. Kurset vil også vekte hvordan bærekraftspørsmål kan og bør integreres som del av denne fagpraksisen.

Working and learning activities

Kurset er bygget opp som en case-basert forelesningsrekke. Hvert foredrag tar utgangspunkt i et eller flere realiserte bygningsprosjekter som ramme for å diskutere en spesifikk problemstilling innenfor et gitt tema.

Curriculum

Kurshylle og moodleside med artikler og referanser. 

Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Other assessment method, define in comment fieldGroupPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Other assessment method, define in comment field
Grouping:Group
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Attendance
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:

60 160

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK6 By og Arkitektur
Credits: 
18
Course code: 
60 160
Level of study: 
Bachelor
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2024
Person in charge
Andreas Kalstveit
Required prerequisite knowledge

Bestått alle emner i GK1 og GK2.

Bestått studiodelen av GK3 og GK4.

Gjennomført (dvs. fått  godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering) i øvrige emner GK3, GK4 og hele GK5.

Course content

6. semester utgjør overgangen til masterstudiet, som i større grad enn grunnundervisningen preges av individuelle valg og faglig spesialisering. Dette skal reflekteres både i oppgavestilling og undervisningsform på GK6. Studioet inneholder aspekter fra de øvrige semestrene i grunnundervisningen, og er ment å samle og videreutvikle allerede tilegnet fagkunnskap. I tillegg skal studioet styrke studentenes teoretiske kompetanse og evne til fagdiskusjon som del av et individuelt prosjektforløp. Studioet reflekterer kompleksiteten i arkitektfaget sett som praksisform, hvor en gitt oppgave kan være preget av ulike faglige innfallsvinkler og ha mange mulige formsvar. Oppgaven som stilles vektlegger undersøkelse og avveining av til dels motsetningsfylte faktorer i en kompleks bykontekst, hvor møtet mellom program, struktur og morfologi skal formuleres i et større arkitekturprosjekt. 

Learning outcome

Etter endt kurs har studentene opparbeidet kunnskap om, og vise ferdigheter i: 1. Å arbeide selvstendig med et arkitekturprosjekt i urban kontekst, basert på enn gitt tomt og delvis gitt program. 2. Å utvikle en reflektert og kritisk holdning til plankrav, program og arkitektonisk/urban kontekst. 3. Å utvikle romlige konsepter og kunne ta avgjørelser basert på komplekse og ofte motsetningsfylte urbane og arkitektoniske behov. 

Working and learning activities

Studiet vil være basert på prosjekteringsprosesser knyttet til en gitt problemstilling og kontekst. Studentene vil arbeide med å utvikle en egen innfallsvinkel til oppgaven gjennom analyse og tematiske studier. Basert på dette, vil studentene individuelt utarbeide et arkitekturprosjekt. Det vil gjennomføres delgjennomganger, individuell prosjektveiledning og workshops i tillegg til avsluttende gjennomgang.

Curriculum

Pensum vil finnes på kursets hylle i biblioteket ved kursoppstart. Tekster vil også ligge på moodle.

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Exercise Not required
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Exercise
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Not required
Comment:
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualPass / fail
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:Pass / fail
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Attendance
Excursion
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Attendance
Comment:
Workload activity:Excursion
Comment:

80 144 Norwegian Architectural History

Emnenavn på Norwegian Bokmål: 
GK4 Norsk Arkitekturhistorie
Credits: 
6
Course code: 
80 144
Level of study: 
Bachelor
Teaching semester: 
2024 Spring
Assessment semester: 
2024 Spring
Language of instruction: 
Norwegian
Year: 
2024
Person in charge
Kolbjørn Nesje Nybø
Required prerequisite knowledge

Bestått studiodelen av GK1 og GK2. 

Gjennomført (dvs. fått godkjent eventuelle arbeidskrav, ha oppfylt eventuelle krav til oppmøte og levert inn besvarelse til vurdering) øvrige emner i GK1 og 2, samt hele GK3.

Course content

Innføring i norsk arkitekturhistorie.

Learning outcome

Kurset gir innsikt i bygningstyper, byggeskikker og sentrale arkitekter i den norske arkitekturhistorien. Studenten får innføring i akademisk essayskriving, og skal være i stand til å presentere en arkitekt, en sak eller en bygning historisk og arkitektonisk med presise kildebruk.

Working and learning activities

Kurset består av forelesninger om norsk arkitektur fra bronsealder til slutten av 1900-tallet. Siktemålet er å kontekstualisere norsk byggeskikk og arkitektur kulturelt og teknologisk, med blikk for utviklingstrekk, grunnprinsipper og verdier.

Underveis skriver studentene tre essays som gruppearbeid, som presenteres og diskuteres på tre litteraturseminarer. Mot slutten av kurset skriver studentene et selvvalgt, individuelt essay. Dette er å betrakte som kursets eksamen. Kurset avsluttes med en ukes buss-ekskursjon i Norge

Curriculum

Lenke til kurslitteratur i Leganto.

Obligatorisk pensum

Brekke, Nils Georg, Per Jonas Nordhagen, Sir Skjold Lexau. Norsk arkitekturhistorie. Fra steinalder og bronsesalder til 21. århundre. Oslo: Det Norske Samlaget Oslo, 2003.

Bugge, Gunnar. Christian Norberg-Schulz. Stav og laft I Norge. Oslo: Norsk arkitekturforlag 1990.

Christensen, Arne Lie. Den norske byggeskikken: Hus og bolig på landsbygda fra middelalder til vår egen tid. Oslo: Pax, 1995.

Lund, Nils Ole. Arkitekturteorier siden 1945. Arkitektens Forlag 2001.

Anbefalt litteratur

Aarønes, Lars. Norsk Funkis. Oslo: Stenersens, 2007.

Amundsen, Kari et al.  Complet færdige huse – Strømmen trævarefabrik, ferdighusproduksjon 1884–1929. Oslo: Forlaget Bonytt, 2002.  

Anker, Peter. Stavkirkene: deres egenart og historie. Oslo: Cappelen, 1997.  

Berre, Nina. Arkitekt Rolf Prag. Moderne på Hedmarken. Hamar: Hedmark fylkesmuseum, Domkirkeodden, 2012.

Bing, Morten og Espen Johnsen, Espen (red.). Nye hjem – Bomiljøer i mellomkrigstiden. Oslo: Norsk Folkemuseum, 1998.  

Brænne, Jon et al. Arne Korsmo – Arkitektur og design. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 2004.

Bugge, Gunnar og Christian Norberg-Schulz. Stav og laft i Norge. Early wooden architecture in Norway. Oslo: Byggekunst, 1975.

Christie, Håkon. Middelalderen bygger i tre. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1974.  

Christensen, Arne Lie. Det Norske landskapet. Om landskap og landskapsforståelse i kulturhistorisk perspektiv. Oslo: Pax, 2002.  

Donnelly, Marion C. Architecture in the Scandinavian Countries. Cambridge, Mass: MIT, 1992.

Dobloug, Margrethe. Bak verket – Kunnskapsfelt og formgenererende faktorer i nyttearkitektur 1935–1985. Oslo: AHO, 2006.

Drange, Tore, Hans Olaf Aanensen og Jon Brænne. Gamle trehus. Historikk, reparasjon og vedlikehold. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1992.

Eldal. Jens Christian. Sveitserstil? – den internasjonale historismens mangfoldige trearkitektur. Oslo: Pax 2019.

Erichsen, Jon. Drømmen om Norge – Norske huse i Danmark gennem 250 år. København: Christian Ejler´s Forlag, 1999.

Findal, Wenche. Funksjonalismens boliger – form, funksjon, komfort. Oslo: Pax, 2007.

Findal, Wenche. Nordisk Funksjonalisme – det internasjonale og det nasjonale. Oslo: Ad Notam/Gyldendal, 1995.  

Findal, Wenche. Norsk Modernistisk Arkitektur – om funksjonalismen. Oslo: Cappelen, 1996.

Foreningen til norske Fortidsminnesmerkers bevaring.  Årbok 1992.

Grønvold, Ulf. Frederik Konow Lund – arkitekten som moret seg. Oslo: Norsk Arkitekturforlag, 1989.

Grønvold, Ulf. Lars Backer og hans tid. Oslo: Pax, 2016.

Grønvold, Ulf. Lund & Slaatto. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1988

Gunnarsjaa. Arne. Norges arkitekturhistorie. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag, 2006.

Gunnarsjaa, Arne. Norsk arkitekturleksikon. Oslo: Abstrakt Forlag, 1999.

Holan, Jerry. Norwegian wood: Tradition of building. Foreword by Christian Norberg-Schulz. New York: Rizzoli, 1990.

Horgen, Jan E. Norske Prestegårder – folk og hus. Landbruksforlaget, 1999.

Hvattum, Mari. Heinrich Ernst Schirmer. Kosmopolittenes arkitekt. Oslo: Pax, 2014.

Johnsen, Espen. Erling Viksjø – eksperimenter i form og betong. Oslo: Pax 2020

Langdalen, Erik et al. Concrete Oslo. Oslo: Torpedo, 2018.

Lexau, Siri Skjold. Kongens Byer. Den internasjonale bakgrunnen for Christian 4s byplanlegging i Norge. Oslo: Vigmostad og Bjørke, 2007.

Lending, Mari og Mari Hvattum. «Vor tids fordringer». Norske arkitekturdebatter 1818–1919. Oslo: Pax, 2012.

Losnegård, Gaute og Rolf Losnegård. Peter Andreas Blix – I strid for vern og vekst. Førde og Leikanger: Selja forlag/ Skald forlag, 2001.

Norberg-Schulz, Christian og Gennaro Postiglione. Sverre Fehn. Ssamlede arbeider. Oslo: Damm, 2003.  

Norberg-Schulz, Christian. Nattlandene. Om byggekunst i Norden. Oslo: Gyldendal, 1993.  

Nybø, Kolbjørn Nesje. Husa våre. Arkitekturarven i Sogn og Fjordane. Selja forlag, 2019.

Røyrane. Eva. Arkitekt Peter Helland Hansen. Skald 2021.

Seip, Elisabeth (red.). Grosch. Arkitekten som ga form til det nye Norge. Oslo: Pax, 2001.

Sørby, Hild. Klar ferdig hus. Norske ferdighus gjennom tidene. Oslo: Ad Notam/Gyldendal, 1992.

Thiis-Evensen. Thomas. (m. Kolbjørn Nesje Nybø). Europas arkitekturhistorie. Fra ide til form. Oslo: Gyldendal, 1995.

Thiis-Evensen, Thomas. The Postmodernists Jan&Jon. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, 1984.

Torvanger, Åse Moe. Kristian Bjerknes. Bevarer og fornyer. Oslo: Messel, 2001.  

Tostrup, Elisabeth. Planetveien 12. Arne Korsmo og Grete Prytz Kittelsens hus. Oslo: Pax, 2012.

Tostrup, Elisabeth. Wenche Selmer. Omtankens arkitektur. Oslo: Gaidaros, 2002.

Valebrokk, Eva et al. Norske slott herregårder og gods. Oslo: Andresen og Butenschøn, 2003.  

Mandatory courseworkCourseworks requiredPresence requiredComment
Presence required Not required
Obligatoriske arbeidskrav:
Mandatory coursework:Presence required
Courseworks required:
Presence required:Not required
Comment:
Form of assessmentGroupingGrading scaleComment
Project assignmentIndividualA-F
Vurderinger:
Form of assessment:Project assignment
Grouping:Individual
Grading scale:A-F
Comment:
Workload activityComment
Excursion
Forventet arbeidsinnsats:
Workload activity:Excursion
Comment:

Pages